Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37109079›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Radiation Exposure and Frequency of Dental, Bitewing and Occlusal Radiographs in Children and Adolescents.

Ina Manuela Schüler, Christoph-Ludwig Hennig, Rika Buschek, Rebecca Scherbaum, Collin Jacobs, Marcel Scheithauer, Hans-Joachim Mentzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impact of radiographic examination timing and gag reflex on dental fear and cooperation in children: a comparative clinical study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Objective Measurement of Tooth Color Using Spectrophotometry and ICDAS: Quantifying CIELAB Color Changes Across Caries Severity.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A comprehensive review of the mental spine.Anatomy & cell biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ina Manuela SchülerSection Preventive Dentistry and Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Jena University Hospital, 07743 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5646-7919
Christoph-Ludwig HennigDepartment of Orthodontics, Jena University Hospital, 07743 Jena, Germany.
Rika BuschekSection of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Rebecca ScherbaumSection of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Collin JacobsDepartment of Orthodontics, Jena University Hospital, 07743 Jena, Germany.
Marcel ScheithauerRadiation Protection, Centre for Health and Safety Management, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Hans-Joachim MentzelSection of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental radiographs are valuable diagnostic aids for oral healthcare, but exposure to ionizing radiation carries health risks, especially in children due to their high radio-sensitivity. Valid reference values for intraoral radiographs in children and adolescents are still missing. This study aimed to investigate the radiation dose values and underlying justifications of dental, bitewing and occlusal X-rays in children and adolescents. Data from routinely executed intraoral radiographs between 2002 and 2020 with conventional and digital tube-heads were extracted from the Radiology Information System. The effective exposure was calculated from technical parameters and statistical tests performed. A total number of 4455 intraoral (3128 dental, 903 bitewing and 424 occlusal) radiographs were investigated. For dental and bitewing radiographs, the dose area product (DAP) was 2.57 cGy × cm

Indexed as

bitewingdental radiologydental X-rayseffective doseradiation exposureradiographsingle tooth radiographsX-ray in children

Identifiers

PMID37109079
PMCPMC10141634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.