Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37108389›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Jinzhi Xu, Lijun Qin, Xinyi Xu, Hong Shen, Xingyong Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Complete genome sequence of theMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  9. A Novel Bacitracin-like Peptide from Mangrove-IsolatedAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinzhi XuCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610052, China.
Lijun QinCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610052, China.
Xinyi XuCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610052, China.
Hong ShenCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Xingyong YangCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610052, China.
Chengdu University · CNSouthwest University · CN

Funding

Chengdu University Talent Project 2081922015the Basic Research and Frontier Exploration Foundation of Chongqing cstc2017jcyjBX00078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) can promote plant growth in various ways, allowing PGPB to replace chemical fertilizers to avoid environmental pollution. PGPB is also used for bioremediation and in plant pathogen control. The isolation and evaluation of PGPB are essential not only for practical applications, but also for basic research. Currently, the known PGPB strains are limited, and their functions are not fully understood. Therefore, the growth-promoting mechanism needs to be further explored and improved. The

Indexed as

BacillusBrassicaMicrobiotaBacteriaGossypiumPlant RootsBacillus paralicheniformis RP01 straingrowth-related genesplant growthplant growth-promoting bacteriaroot length

Identifiers

PMID37108389
PMCPMC10138817
OpenAlexW4367320520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.