Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37108319›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Triaging HPV-Positive Cervical Samples with p16 and Ki-67 Dual Stained Cytology within an Organized Screening Program-A Prospective Observational Study from Western Norway.

Irene Tveiterås Øvestad, Ingvild Dalen, Marie S Andersland, Olav K Vintermyr, Pia Moltu, Jannicke M Berland, Emilius A M Janssen, Hans Kristian Haugland

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How to evaluate and select cervical screening and triage tests in vaccinated populations.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Prospective Evaluation of Cytology, CINtecJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene Tveiterås ØvestadDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway.
Ingvild DalenDepartment of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8160-3211
Marie S AnderslandDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5053 Bergen, Norway.
Olav K VintermyrDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5053 Bergen, Norway.
Pia MoltuDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway.
Jannicke M BerlandDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway.
Emilius A M JanssenDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7760-5396
Hans Kristian HauglandDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5053 Bergen, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of high-risk human papillomavirus testing (hrHPV testing) as a screening method in substitute for cytology has evoked the need for more sensitive and less objective tests for the triage of HPV-positive women. In a cohort of 1763 HPV-positive women, the potential of immunocytochemical p16 and Ki-67 dual staining as compared to cytology, alone or in combination with HPV partial genotyping, was tested for triage of women attending a cervical cancer screening program. Performance was measured using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Comparisons were assessed using logistic regression models and the McNemar test. Dual staining was evaluated in a prospectively collected study cohort of 1763 HPV-screened women. For triage of CIN2+ and CIN3+, NPV and sensitivity, 91.8% and 94.2% versus 87.9% and 89.7%, respectively, were significantly higher using dual staining together with HPV 16/18 positive, as compared to cytology (

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Early Detection of CancerFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansKi-67 AntigenTriageVaginal SmearsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Ki-67 AntigencytologyHPVimmunocytochemistryKi-67organized screening programp16

Identifiers

PMID37108319
PMCPMC10138375
OpenAlexW4365454146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.