Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37108246›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Efficacy of Essential Oils in Relieving Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Maria Tiziana Corasaniti, Giacinto Bagetta, Luigi Antonio Morrone, Paolo Tonin, Kengo Hamamura, Takafumi Hayashi, Francesca Guida, Sabatino Maione, Damiana Scuteri

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effects of aromatherapy and music on pain, anxiety, and stress levels in palliative care patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. In Vitro and In Silico Evaluation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Tiziana CorasanitiDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6472-0697
Giacinto BagettaPharmacotechnology Documentation & Transfer Unit, Department of Pharmacy, Preclinical & Translational Pharmacology, Health & Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8540-6218
Luigi Antonio MorronePharmacotechnology Documentation & Transfer Unit, Department of Pharmacy, Preclinical & Translational Pharmacology, Health & Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy.
Paolo ToninRegional Center for Serious Brain Injuries, S. Anna Institute, 88900 Crotone, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4867-1378
Kengo HamamuraDepartment of Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9146-8554
Takafumi HayashiLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai 981-8558, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1932-5158
Francesca GuidaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Sabatino MaioneDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Damiana ScuteriPharmacotechnology Documentation & Transfer Unit, Department of Pharmacy, Preclinical & Translational Pharmacology, Health & Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5846-7058
Istituto S.Anna Crotone · ITUniversity of Calabria · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITKyushu University · JPMagna Graecia University · ITTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JP

Funding

Phase 2 RIABEO Funding (Executive Decree n.6790 of 22 June 2022) Progetto Ingegno POR Calabria FESR 2014/2020-Azione 1 1 5-Sostegno all'Avanzamento tecnologico delle Imprese Attraverso il Finanziamento di Linee Pilota e Azioni di Validazione Precoce di Pr Phase 2 RIABEO Funding (Executive Decree n.6790 of 22 June 2022) Progetto Ingegno POR Calabria FESR 2014/2020-Azione 1 1 5-Sostegno all'Avanzamento tecnologico delle Imprese Attraverso il Finanziamento di Linee Pilota e Azioni di Validazione Precoce di Pr
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 80% of patients affected by cancer develops cancer-related pain, one of the most feared consequences because of its intractable nature, particularly in the terminal stage of the disease. Recent evidence-based recommendations on integrative medicine for the management of cancer pain underline the role of natural products. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims at appraising for the first time the efficacy of aromatherapy in cancer pain in clinical studies with different design according to the most updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 recommendations. The search retrieves 1002 total records. Twelve studies are included and six are eligible for meta-analysis. The present study demonstrates significant efficacy of the use of essential oils in the reduction of the intensity of pain associated with cancer (

Indexed as

AromatherapyCancer PainNeoplasmsOils, VolatileHumansPainOils, Volatilearomatherapycancer painessential oilsintegrative medicineoncologic paintumor pain

Identifiers

PMID37108246
PMCPMC10138439
OpenAlexW4365146814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.