ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
BioGraph: Data Model for Linking and Querying Diverse Biological Metadata.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biophysics education section and computational training discussion at VII Congress of Russian Biophysicists.Biophysical reviews · 2023Article
- BGRS: bioinformatics of genome regulation and data integration.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Research Topics of the Bioinformatics of Gene Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Studying the association of gene function, diseases, and regulatory gene network reconstruction demands data compatibility. Data from different databases follow distinct schemas and are accessible in heterogenic ways. Although the experiments differ, data may still be related to the same biological entities. Some entities may not be strictly biological, such as geolocations of habitats or paper references, but they provide a broader context for other entities. The same entities from different datasets can share similar properties, which may or may not be found within other datasets. Joint, simultaneous data fetching from multiple data sources is complicated for the end-user or, in many cases, unsupported and inefficient due to differences in data structures and ways of accessing the data. We propose BioGraph-a new model that enables connecting and retrieving information from the linked biological data that originated from diverse datasets. We have tested the model on metadata collected from five diverse public datasets and successfully constructed a knowledge graph containing more than 17 million model objects, of which 2.5 million are individual biological entity objects. The model enables the selection of complex patterns and retrieval of matched results that can be discovered only by joining the data from multiple sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.