Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37107992›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Onset Time of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared with Its Thoracic Counterpart: Case Reports.

Wei-Chen Chung, Yi-Jie Kuo, Shun-Ming Chan, Jin-De Hou, Ting-Hsun Lin, Jui-An Lin

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wei-Chen ChungDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.
Yi-Jie KuoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9889-5054
Shun-Ming ChanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9689-316X
Jin-De HouDivision of Anesthesiology, Hualien Armed Forces General Hospital, Hualien 97144, Taiwan.
Ting-Hsun LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Jui-An LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital · TWWan Fang Hospital · TWHualien Armed Forces General Hospital · TWTri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

Hualien Armed Forces General Hospital HAFGH_A_112001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) at the level of the fifth thoracic vertebra (T5) is a novel technique, first published in 2016, which was found to be effective in both acute and chronic pain control. The mechanism of action and spread of local anesthetic of the ESPB at the lumbar region are thought to differ from those of the thoracic ESPB; however, the difference in onset time has never been evaluated. As for the onset of lumbar ESPBs, we presented three cases: two received lumbar ESPBs (one with chronic low back pain and one with acute postoperative hip pain), and the third one with chronic back pain received a thoracic ESPB. We administered 30 mL of 0.3% ropivacaine in all three patients, but the analgesic effect did not reach its maximum until 3 and 1.5 h, respectively, in the lumbar ESPB cases. On the contrary, the thoracic ESPB case experienced noticeable pain relief within 30 min. The onset time was considerably longer than that reported in earlier reports on ESPBs, and the lumbar ESPB achieved its peak effect much later than the thoracic ESPB using the same formula of local anesthetic. While the delayed-onset lumbar ESPB may have some drawbacks for treating acute postoperative pain, it still could produce significant analgesia, once it took effect, when given to patients suffering from hip surgery with large incisions and intractable low back pain. The current data suggested that the onset time of a lumbar ESPB may be delayed compared with its thoracic counterpart. Therefore, the local anesthetic formula and injection timing should be adjusted for a lumbar ESPB when applied in the perioperative period to make the onset of the analgesic effect coincide with the immediate postoperative pain. Without this concept in mind, clinicians may consider a lumbar ESPB to be ineffective before it takes effect, and consequently treat the patients inadequately with this technique. Future randomized controlled trials should be designed according to our observations to compare lumbar ESPB with its thoracic counterpart regarding onset time.

Indexed as

lumbar vertebraenerve block: erector spinae plane blocknerve block: onset time

Identifiers

PMID37107992
PMCPMC10137791
OpenAlexW4366281326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.