Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37107975›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Using Machine Learning for the Risk Factors Classification of Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Yi-Ling Cheng, Ying-Ru Wu, Kun-Der Lin, Chun-Hung Richard Lin, I-Mei Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi-Ling ChengDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7484-1916
Ying-Ru WuDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan.
Kun-Der LinThe Lin's Clinic, Kaohsiung 807057, Taiwan.
Chun-Hung Richard LinDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0840-394X
I-Mei LinDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9658-1783

Funding

Kaohsiung Medical University NSYSUKMU111KN-002Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST-111-2410-H-037-004-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several risk factors are related to glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), including demographics, medical conditions, negative emotions, lipid profiles, and heart rate variability (HRV; to present cardiac autonomic activity). The interactions between these risk factors remain unclear. This study aimed to use machine learning methods of artificial intelligence to explore the relationships between various risk factors and glycemic control in T2DM patients. The study utilized a database from Lin et al. (2022) that included 647 T2DM patients. Regression tree analysis was conducted to identify the interactions among risk factors that contribute to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values, and various machine learning methods were compared for their accuracy in classifying T2DM patients. The results of the regression tree analysis revealed that high depression scores may be a risk factor in one subgroup but not in others. When comparing different machine learning classification methods, the random forest algorithm emerged as the best-performing method with a small set of features. Specifically, the random forest algorithm achieved 84% accuracy, 95% area under the curve (AUC), 77% sensitivity, and 91% specificity. Using machine learning methods can provide significant value in accurately classifying patients with T2DM when considering depression as a risk factor.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedepressionglycemic controlmachine learningtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID37107975
PMCPMC10138388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.