Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37107912›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Barriers and Facilitators to the Learning and Acquisition of Research Competencies among Nursing Students through Active Methodologies: A Qualitative Study Using Reflective Writing.

Juan Francisco Velarde-García, Beatriz Álvarez-Embarba, María Nieves Moro-Tejedor, Leyre Rodríguez-Leal, Oscar Arrogante, María Gema Alvarado-Zambrano, Jorge Pérez-Corrales, Domingo Palacios-Ceña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juan Francisco Velarde-GarcíaDepartment of Nursing, Red Cross College of Nursing, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Avenida Reina Victoria 28, 28003 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5801-4857
Beatriz Álvarez-EmbarbaDepartment of Nursing, Red Cross College of Nursing, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Avenida Reina Victoria 28, 28003 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2084-3051
María Nieves Moro-TejedorDepartment of Nursing, Red Cross College of Nursing, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Avenida Reina Victoria 28, 28003 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-7454
Leyre Rodríguez-LealDepartment of Nursing, Red Cross College of Nursing, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Avenida Reina Victoria 28, 28003 Madrid, Spain.
Oscar ArroganteResearch Nursing Group of Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8304-9093
María Gema Alvarado-ZambranoHospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana, 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Pérez-CorralesResearch Group of Humanities and Qualitative Research in Health Science (Hum & QRinHS), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Avenida Atenas s/n, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3586-2623
Domingo Palacios-CeñaResearch Group of Humanities and Qualitative Research in Health Science (Hum & QRinHS), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Avenida Atenas s/n, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0669-6339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of educational research, critical thinking skills, and evidence-based practice requires proposals for educational innovation. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of undergraduate nursing students on the barriers and facilitators after the implementation of a novel activity within the course of research methodology, composed of three active learning strategies: (a) project-based learning; (b) small-group learning; and (c) self-directed learning.

methodsA qualitative exploratory study using reflective writing was conducted at the Nursing Department of the Red Cross School (Spain). Seventy-four nursing students participated in the study, enrolled in the research methodology course. Purposive sampling was used. Online reflective notes were collected from a script of open-ended questions. An inductive thematic analysis was performed.

resultsThe new proposals facilitated learning of the subject matter and its contents. They were useful and enabled the students to put the contents into practice. In addition, they improved the students' organization, planning, and involvement. The barriers identified were a lack of time, ambiguity, inadequate tutoring or novelty of the work, and inequity in the distribution of tasks and workloads.

conclusionsOur findings shed light on the barriers and facilitators identified by nursing students when implementing an educational innovation proposal, using three active learning methodologies as learning tools for the subject of nursing research.

Indexed as

nursing studentsproject-based learningqualitative researchself-directed learningsmall-group learning

Identifiers

PMID37107912
PMCPMC10137807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.