Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37107761›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

A Scoping Review of Theoretical Lenses and Methodological Approaches in Indigenous Women's Health and Well-Being Research in North America over the Past Two Decades.

Tricia McGuire-Adams, Janice Cindy Gaudet, Keira A Loukes, Celeste Ferreira

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tricia McGuire-AdamsFaculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0413-0665
Janice Cindy GaudetCampus Saint-Jean, University of Albert, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.
Keira A LoukesSchool of Outdoor Recreation, Parks & Tourism, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7841-3871
Celeste FerreiraSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CALakehead University · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

CIHR 155896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical approaches influence research design, engagement, and outcomes. The relevance of critical theoretical and methodological approaches to Indigenous women's health and well-being research has increased in the last decade. It is difficult to assess the ways in which theoretical lenses can effectively interrupt and challenge systemic erasure, ongoing harms, and deficit-based (ill-health-centered) approaches to Indigenous women's health and well-being, a fact that is not broadly acknowledged. We conducted a scoping review to (a) map the type and frequency of critical theoretical lenses used by researchers focused on Indigenous women's health and well-being in North America over the past two decades and (b) identify which topics tend to use which theoretical lens. We have conducted a scoping review to examine peer-reviewed articles from eight electronic databases. In the articles selected over 2000-2021, we found an increase in the use of community-based participatory research, decolonial lenses, and feminist lenses. Over the last decade, there has been a decrease in quantitative social science approaches. While a range of critical theoretical and methodological approaches are increasingly being applied, the use of cultural resurgence and Indigenous feminism in health research is not widespread.

Indexed as

FeminismWomen's HealthFemaleHumansNorth AmericaSocial Sciencescritical theorycultural resurgenceIndigenous women’s health and well-beingIndigenous women’s wellness

Identifiers

PMID37107761
PMCPMC10138645
OpenAlexW4365147498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.