Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37107671›Full record

ArticleGenes2023

Prenatal Detection of Trisomy 2: Considerations for Genetic Counseling and Testing.

Olga E Talantova, Alla S Koltsova, Andrei V Tikhonov, Anna A Pendina, Olga V Malysheva, Olga A Tarasenko, Elena S Vashukova, Elena S Shabanova, Arina V Golubeva, Olga G Chiryaeva and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olga E TalantovaD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Alla S KoltsovaD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6587-9429
Andrei V TikhonovD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Anna A PendinaD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Olga V MalyshevaD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8626-5071
Olga A TarasenkoD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Elena S VashukovaD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Elena S ShabanovaD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Arina V GolubevaFaculty of Biology, Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya emb., 7/9, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1613-222X
Olga G ChiryaevaD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Andrey S GlotovD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7465-4504
Olesya N BespalovaD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Olga A EfimovaD.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, Mendeleevskaya Line, 3, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4495-0983
Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology named after D.O. Ott · RUSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on the case of prenatal detection of trisomy 2 in placental biopsy and further algorithm of genetic counseling and testing. A 29-year-old woman with first-trimester biochemical markers refused chorionic villus sampling and preferred targeted non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), which showed low risk for aneuploidies 13, 18, 21, and X. A series of ultrasound examinations revealed increased chorion thickness at 13/14 weeks of gestation and fetal growth retardation, a hyperechoic bowel, challenging visualization of the kidneys, dolichocephaly, ventriculomegaly, increase in placental thickness, and pronounced oligohydramnios at 16/17 weeks of gestation. The patient was referred to our center for an invasive prenatal diagnosis. The patient's blood and placenta were sampled for whole-genome sequencing-based NIPT and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), respectively. Both investigations revealed trisomy 2. Further prenatal genetic testing in order to confirm trisomy 2 in amniocytes and/or fetal blood was highly questionable because oligohydramnios and fetal growth retardation made amniocentesis and cordocentesis technically unfeasible. The patient opted to terminate the pregnancy. Pathological examination of the fetus revealed internal hydrocephalus, atrophy of brain structure, and craniofacial dysmorphism. Conventional cytogenetic analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed chromosome 2 mosaicism with a prevalence of trisomic clone in the placenta (83.2% vs. 16.8%) and a low frequency of trisomy 2, which did not exceed 0.6% in fetal tissues, advocating for low-level true fetal mosaicism. To conclude, in pregnancies at risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities that refuse invasive prenatal diagnosis, whole-genome sequencing-based NIPT, but not targeted NIPT, should be considered. In prenatal cases of trisomy 2, true mosaicism should be distinguished from placental-confined mosaicism using cytogenetic analysis of amniotic fluid cells or fetal blood cells. However, if material sampling is impossible due to oligohydramnios and/or fetal growth retardation, further decisions should be based on a series of high-resolution fetal ultrasound examinations. Genetic counseling for the risk of uniparental disomy in a fetus is also required.

Indexed as

OligohydramniosTrisomyAdultChromosomes, Human, Pair 2Comparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleFetal Growth RetardationGenetic CounselingHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePlacentaPregnancyinvasive prenatal diagnosislow-level mosaicismmosaicismnon-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPT)trisomy 2ultrasound markers of chromosomal abnormalities

Identifiers

PMID37107671
PMCPMC10138005
OpenAlexW4365509363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.