ArticleGenes2023
Gene Association Analysis of Quantitative Trait Based on Functional Linear Regression Model with Local Sparse Estimator.
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional linear regression models have been widely used in the gene association analysis of complex traits. These models retain all the genetic information in the data and take full advantage of spatial information in genetic variation data, which leads to brilliant detection power. However, the significant association signals identified by the high-power methods are not all the real causal SNPs, because it is easy to regard noise information as significant association signals, leading to a false association. In this paper, a method based on the sparse functional data association test (SFDAT) of gene region association analysis is developed based on a functional linear regression model with local sparse estimation. The evaluation indicators CSR and DL are defined to evaluate the feasibility and performance of the proposed method with other indicators. Simulation studies show that: (1) SFDAT performs well under both linkage equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium simulation; (2) SFDAT performs successfully for gene regions (including common variants, low-frequency variants, rare variants and mix variants); (3) With power and type I error rates comparable to OLS and Smooth, SFDAT has a better ability to handle the zero regions. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.