ArticleGenes2023
CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing System Can Alter Gene Expression and Induce DNA Damage Accumulation.
Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient genetic perturbation of murine sensory neurons in vivo using CRISPR/Cas9.The journal of pain · 2026Article
- CRISPR-Cas9: Transforming Functional Genomics, Precision Medicine, and Drug Development - Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Current gene therapy · 2026Review
- Efficient genetic perturbation of murine sensory neuronsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Revisiting strategies to target ABC transporter-mediated drug resistance in CNS cancer.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas-Based Ex Vivo Gene Therapy and Lysosomal Storage Disorders: A Perspective Beyond Cas9.Cells · 2025Review
- DNA large fragment deleting by compact, sequence-motif-free and specific TaqTth-hpRNA assisted with the microhomology-mediated end joining pathway.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- CRISPR antiviral inhibits neurotrophic JC polyomavirus in 2D and 3D culture models through dual-gRNA excision by SaCas9.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Article
- Generation of Astrocyte-specific BEST1 Conditional Knockout Mouse with Reduced Tonic GABA Inhibition in the Brain.Experimental neurobiology · 2024Article
- Generation and Characterization of a NovelThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and the associated protein (Cas) gene editing can induce P53 activation, large genome fragment deletions, and chromosomal structural variations. Here, gene expression was detected in host cells using transcriptome sequencing following CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. We found that the gene editing reshaped the gene expression, and the number of differentially expressed genes was correlated with the gene editing efficiency. Moreover, we found that alternative splicing occurred at random sites and that targeting a single site for gene editing may not result in the formation of fusion genes. Further, gene ontology and KEGG enrichment analysis showed that gene editing altered the fundamental biological processes and pathways associated with diseases. Finally, we found that cell growth was not affected; however, the DNA damage response protein-γH2AX-was activated. This study revealed that CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing may induce cancer-related changes and provided basic data for research on the safety risks associated with the use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.