Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37107094›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry.

Dominik Szymski, Nike Walter, Paula Krull, Oliver Melsheimer, Siegmund Lang, Alexander Grimberg, Volker Alt, Arnd Steinbrück, Markus Rupp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dominik SzymskiDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1739-8524
Nike WalterDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0654-2076
Paula KrullDeutsches Endoprothesenregister (EPRD) gGmbH, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
Oliver MelsheimerDeutsches Endoprothesenregister (EPRD) gGmbH, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
Siegmund LangDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0459-9092
Alexander GrimbergDeutsches Endoprothesenregister (EPRD) gGmbH, 10623 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8062-788X
Volker AltDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0208-4650
Arnd SteinbrückDeutsches Endoprothesenregister (EPRD) gGmbH, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
Markus RuppDepartment for Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7221-3783
University Hospital Regensburg · DEGerman Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic-loaded bone cement in arthroplasties is currently experiencing increased usage. Therefore, single and double antibiotic-loaded bone cements are commercially available and used in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this investigation was to compare the clinical use of single compared to dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement for implant fixation after femoral neck fracture. Further infection rates were to be compared in (partial) arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture for both treatment options.

methodsOn the basis of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD), all cases of femoral neck fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty (HA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) with single and dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement, were included into the data analysis. The infection risk was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

resultsIn total, 26,845 cases (HA 76.3%-THA: 23.7%) with femoral neck fracture were included. Within recent years, an increasing usage of dual antibiotic-loaded cement in Germany, with a current proportion of 7.30% in arthroplasty procedures for femoral neck fracture treatment, has been observed. In patients treated with HA, the proportion of dual antibiotic-loaded cement was 7.86%, while in those treated with THA, 5.46% of all prostheses were fixated with a two antibiotic component cement. For all arthroplasty procedures using single antibiotic-loaded bone cement after six months 1.8%, after one year 1.9%, and after five years 2.3%, of the cases failed due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), while in the same time period, in cases with dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement 1.5%, 1.5% and 1.5% suffered from infection (

conclusionsThe use of dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement is increasingly used in arthroplasty procedures after femoral neck fractures. It demonstrates a reduction of PJI after HA and seems, therefore, to be a useful method for the prevention of infection, especially in patients with increased risk factors for PJI.

Indexed as

antibiotic-loaded bone cementantibioticsbone cementfemoral neck fracturehemiarthroplastyhip arthroplastyperiprosthetic joint infectionPMMArevision

Identifiers

PMID37107094
PMCPMC10135143
OpenAlexW4363674215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.