Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106806›Full record

ReviewBiology2023

Structural Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome and Non-Invasive Cardiac Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Martina De Raffele, Assunta Di Domenico, Cristina Balla, Francesco Vitali, Alberto Boccadoro, Rita Pavasini, Marco Micillo, Marta Cocco, Gianluca Campo, Matteo Bertini and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Beyond the type 1 pattern: comprehensive risk stratification in Brugada syndrome.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Brugada syndrome in the forensic field: what do we know to date?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martina De RaffeleCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4193-0418
Assunta Di DomenicoCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.
Cristina BallaCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2110-8961
Francesco VitaliCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.
Alberto BoccadoroCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0856-3305
Rita PavasiniCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1763-9711
Marco MicilloCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9122-9534
Marta CoccoCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.
Gianluca CampoCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5150-188X
Matteo BertiniCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5285-7140
Elisabetta TonetCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Cona, FE, Italy.
Arcispedale Sant'Anna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review is to identify possible structural abnormalities of BrS and their potential association with symptoms, risk stratification, and prognosis. (1) Background: BrS has always been considered a purely electrical disease and imaging techniques do not currently play a specific role in the diagnosis of this arrhythmic syndrome. Some authors have recently hypothesized the presence of structural and functional abnormalities. Therefore, several studies investigated the presence of pathological features in echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with BrS, but results were controversial. (2) Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature on the spectrum of features detected by echocardiography and cardiac MRI. Articles were searched in Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Biomed Central. Only papers published in English and in peer-reviewed journals up to November 2021 were selected. After an initial evaluation, 596 records were screened; the literature search identified 19 relevant articles. (3) Results: The imaging findings associated with BrS were as follows: right ventricular dilation, right ventricular wall motion abnormalities, delayed right ventricular contraction, speckle and feature tracking abnormalities, late gadolinium enhancement, and fat infiltration in the right ventricle. Furthermore, these features emerged more frequently in patients carrying the genetic mutation on the sodium voltage-gated channel α-subunit 5 (SCN5A) gene. (4) Conclusions: Specific imaging features detected by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance are associated with BrS. However, this population appears to be heterogeneous and imaging anomalies emerged to be more frequent in patients carrying genetic mutations of SCN5A. Future studies with an evaluation of BrS patients are needed to identify the specific association linking the Brugada pattern, imaging abnormalities and their possible correlation with prognosis.

Indexed as

Brugada syndromecardiac magnetic resonancecardiomyopathyechocardiography

Identifiers

PMID37106806
PMCPMC10136319
OpenAlexW4366089817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.