Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106743›Full record

ReviewBiology2023

Critical Role of Regrowth Conditions in Post-Cryopreservation of In Vitro Plant Germplasm.

Elena Popova, Irina Kulichenko, Haeng-Hoon Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Perspectives on Plant Germplasm Conservation and Biobanking.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Plant Tissue Culture: A Short-Term Conservation Tool.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Genetic Stability and Photosystem II Functioning of In Vitro-RecoveredInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative Studies for Cryopreservation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena PopovaK.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Botanicheskaya 35, Moscow 127276, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4655-6974
Irina KulichenkoK.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Botanicheskaya 35, Moscow 127276, Russia.
Haeng-Hoon KimDepartment of Agricultural Life Science, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Republic of Korea.
Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology · RUSunchon National University · KR

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 122042700045-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryopreservation is an effective option for the long-term conservation of plant genetic resources, including vegetatively propagated crops and ornamental plants, elite tree genotypes, threatened plant species with non-orthodox seeds or limited seed availability, as well as cell and root cultures useful for biotechnology. With increasing success, an arsenal of cryopreservation methods has been developed and applied to many species and material types. However, severe damage to plant material accumulating during the multi-step cryopreservation procedure often causes reduced survival and low regrowth, even when the optimized protocol is applied. The conditions at the recovery stage play a vital role in supporting material regrowth after cryopreservation and, when optimized, may shift the life-and-death balance toward a positive outcome. In this contribution, we provide an overview of the five main strategies available at the recovery stage to improve post-cryopreservation survival of in vitro plant materials and their further proliferation and development. In particular, we discuss the modification of the recovery medium composition (iron- and ammonium-free), exogenous additives to cope with oxidative stress and absorb toxic chemicals, and the modulation of medium osmotic potential. Special attention is paid to plant growth regulators used at various steps of the recovery process to induce the desired morphological response in cryopreserved tissues. Given studies on electron transport and energy provision in rewarmed materials, we discuss the effects of light-and-dark conditions and light quality. We hope that this summary provides a helpful guideline and a set of references for choosing the recovery conditions for plant species that have not been cryopreserved. We also propose that step-wise recovery may be most effective for materials sensitive to cryopreservation-induced osmotic and chemical stresses.

Indexed as

ammoniumantioxidantcryopreservationembryogenic culturesmedium compositionoxidative stressplant cell cultureplant growth regulatorsregenerationroot cultureshoot tips

Identifiers

PMID37106743
PMCPMC10135868
OpenAlexW4362577545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.