ReviewBiology2023
An Organismal Perspective on the Warburg Effect and Models for Proliferation Studies.
Review in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The bioenergetic cost of building a metazoan.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Lactate exacerbates lung damage induced by nanomicroplastic through the gut microbiota-HIF1a/PTBP1 pathway.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Warburg-associated acidification represses lactic fermentation independently of lactate, contribution from real-time NMR on cell-free systems.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in the physiology of proliferation has been generated by human proliferative diseases, i.e., cancers. A vast literature exists on the Warburg effect, which is characterized by aerobic glycolysis, diminished oxygen uptake, and lactate secretion. While these features could be rationalized via the production of biosynthetic precursors, lactate secretion does not fit this paradigm, as it wastes precursors. Forming lactate from pyruvate allows for reoxidizing cytosolic NADH, which is crucial for continued glycolysis and may allow for maintaining large pools of metabolic intermediates. Alternatively, lactate production may not be adaptive, but rather reflect metabolic constraints. A broader sampling of the physiology of proliferation, particularly in organisms that could reoxidize NADH using other pathways, may be necessary to understand the Warburg effect. The best-studied metazoans (e.g., worms, flies, and mice) may not be suitable, as they undergo limited proliferation before initiating meiosis. In contrast, some metazoans (e.g., colonial marine hydrozoans) exhibit a stage in the life cycle (the polyp stage) that only undergoes mitotic proliferation and never carries out meiosis (the medusa stage performs this). Such organisms are prime candidates for general studies of proliferation in multicellular organisms and could at least complement the short-generation models of modern biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.