Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106687›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Review of Voice-Based Pain Detection in Adults Using Artificial Intelligence.

Sahar Borna, Clifton R Haider, Karla C Maita, Ricardo A Torres, Francisco R Avila, John P Garcia, Gioacchino D De Sario Velasquez, Christopher J McLeod, Charles J Bruce, Rickey E Carter and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AI in Medical Questionnaires: Scoping ReviewJournal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Fifth Edition of the Automated Assessment of Pain (AAP 2025).Proceedings of the ... ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ICMI (Conference) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Leveraging voice biomarkers to quantify chronic pain: a rapid review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Pain Research and Treatment: Policy Implications.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sahar BornaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7845-7356
Clifton R HaiderDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
Karla C MaitaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Ricardo A TorresDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Francisco R AvilaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
John P GarciaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Gioacchino D De Sario VelasquezDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Christopher J McLeodDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Charles J BruceDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Rickey E CarterDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0818-273X
Antonio J ForteDivision of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2004-7538
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is a complex and subjective experience, and traditional methods of pain assessment can be limited by factors such as self-report bias and observer variability. Voice is frequently used to evaluate pain, occasionally in conjunction with other behaviors such as facial gestures. Compared to facial emotions, there is less available evidence linking pain with voice. This literature review synthesizes the current state of research on the use of voice recognition and voice analysis for pain detection in adults, with a specific focus on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques. We describe the previous works on pain recognition using voice and highlight the different approaches to voice as a tool for pain detection, such as a human effect or biosignal. Overall, studies have shown that AI-based voice analysis can be an effective tool for pain detection in adult patients with various types of pain, including chronic and acute pain. We highlight the high accuracy of the ML-based approaches used in studies and their limitations in terms of generalizability due to factors such as the nature of the pain and patient population characteristics. However, there are still potential challenges, such as the need for large datasets and the risk of bias in training models, which warrant further research.

Indexed as

machine learningpain assessmentvocal biomarkersvoice analysis

Identifiers

PMID37106687
PMCPMC10135816
OpenAlexW4366683613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.