Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106670›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Structural Identifiability and Observability of Microbial Community Models.

Sandra Díaz-Seoane, Elena Sellán, Alejandro F Villaverde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sandra Díaz-SeoaneDepartment of Systems Engineering & Control, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8642-1639
Elena SellánDepartment of Systems Engineering & Control, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain.
Alejandro F VillaverdeDepartment of Systems Engineering & Control, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7401-7380

Funding

Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria ED431F 2021/003Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2020-113992RA-I00Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación RYC-2019-027537-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological communities are populations of various species interacting in a common location. Microbial communities, which are formed by microorganisms, are ubiquitous in nature and are increasingly used in biotechnological and biomedical applications. They are nonlinear systems whose dynamics can be accurately described by models of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). A number of ODE models have been proposed to describe microbial communities. However, the structural identifiability and observability of most of them-that is, the theoretical possibility of inferring their parameters and internal states by observing their output-have not been determined yet. It is important to establish whether a model possesses these properties, because, in their absence, the ability of a model to make reliable predictions may be compromised. Hence, in this paper, we analyse these properties for the main families of microbial community models. We consider several dimensions and measurements; overall, we analyse more than a hundred different configurations. We find that some of them are fully identifiable and observable, but a number of cases are structurally unidentifiable and/or unobservable under typical experimental conditions. Our results help in deciding which modelling frameworks may be used for a given purpose in this emerging area, and which ones should be avoided.

Indexed as

dynamic modellingidentifiabilitymicrobial communitiesobservabilitysystems biology

Identifiers

PMID37106670
PMCPMC10135947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.