ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Characterization of Biocompatibility of Functional Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-Generation Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting: Advances, Challenges, and Emerging Opportunities.ACS omega · 2026Review
- MXene Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: Design and Translation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Functional Nano-to-Microstructures by Jet Printing and Direct Ink Writing.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Advances and applications of organ-on-a-chip technology.Cell reports methods · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted smart hydrogel bioinks in 3D bioprinting: design, optimization, and construct validation for functional tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Bioinks in systems biology: integrating biomaterial design with cellular network modelling for predictive biofabrication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- 3D Bioprinted Neural Tissues: Emerging Strategies for Regeneration and Disease Modeling.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Genetic and bioactive functionalization of bioinks for 3D bioprinting.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Bioprinting Strategies for Cardiovascular Constructs: From Printing Inks to Vascularization.Polymers · 2025Review
- Rheological, Structural, and Biological Trade-Offs in Bioink Design for 3D Bioprinting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Microgel-based bioink for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting and its applications in tissue engineering.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Effects of Extrusion Pressure During 3D Printing on Viability of Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells in 3D Printed Samples.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Bone Tissue Engineering: Enhancing the Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Regenerative Therapies.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing of Hydrogel as Skin Substitute and Comparative Evaluation of Melanin Production.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advances in 3D bioprinting to enhance translational applications in bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Histology and histopathology · 2025Review
- Double-Network Hydrogel 3D BioPrinting Biocompatible with Fibroblast Cells for Tissue Engineering Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advances and Challenges of Bioassembly Strategies in Neurovascular In Vitro Modeling: An Overview of Current Technologies with a Focus on Three-Dimensional Bioprinting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The cutting-edge progress in bioprinting for biomedicine: principles, applications, and future perspectives.MedComm · 2024Review
- Bioinks and biofabrication techniques for biosensors development: A review.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- The Impact of the Methacrylation Process on the Usefulness of Chitosan as a Biomaterial Component for 3D Printing.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting with suitable bioinks has become a critical tool for fabricating 3D biomimetic complex structures mimicking physiological functions. While enormous efforts have been devoted to developing functional bioinks for 3D bioprinting, widely accepted bioinks have not yet been developed because they have to fulfill stringent requirements such as biocompatibility and printability simultaneously. To further advance our knowledge of the biocompatibility of bioinks, this review presents the evolving concept of the biocompatibility of bioinks and standardization efforts for biocompatibility characterization. This work also briefly reviews recent methodological advances in image analyses to characterize the biocompatibility of bioinks with regard to cell viability and cell-material interactions within 3D constructs. Finally, this review highlights a number of updated contemporary characterization technologies and future perspectives to further advance our understanding of the biocompatibility of functional bioinks for successful 3D bioprinting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.