Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106629›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Evolving Use of Magnets in Surgery: Biomedical Considerations and a Review of Their Current Applications.

William G Lee, Lauren L Evans, Sidney M Johnson, Russell K Woo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. MRI Safety Considerations for Permanent Magnet Implants in Muscle.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William G LeeDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1487-6551
Lauren L EvansDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Sidney M JohnsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.
Russell K WooDepartment of Surgery, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel use of magnetic force to optimize modern surgical techniques originated in the 1970s. Since then, magnets have been utilized as an adjunct or alternative to a wide array of existing surgical procedures, ranging from gastrointestinal to vascular surgery. As the use of magnets in surgery continues to grow, the body of knowledge on magnetic surgical devices from preclinical development to clinical implementation has expanded significantly; however, the current magnetic surgical devices can be organized based on their core function: serving as a guidance system, creating a new connection, recreating a physiologic function, or utilization of an internal-external paired magnet system. The purpose of this article is to discuss the biomedical considerations during magnetic device development and review the current surgical applications of magnetic devices.

Indexed as

anastomosisbypasscompressiondevicemagnetmedicalminimally invasivereviewstricturoplastysurgery

Identifiers

PMID37106629
PMCPMC10136001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.