Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106591›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Anomaly Detection for Sensor Signals Utilizing Deep Learning Autoencoder-Based Neural Networks.

Fatemeh Esmaeili, Erica Cassie, Hong Phan T Nguyen, Natalie O V Plank, Charles P Unsworth, Alan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatemeh EsmaeiliDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1661-8409
Erica CassieThe MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6021, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-9537
Hong Phan T NguyenThe MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6021, New Zealand.
Natalie O V PlankThe MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6021, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9798-9657
Charles P UnsworthDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Alan WangAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.

Funding

Royal Society of New Zealand 5000357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anomaly detection is a significant task in sensors' signal processing since interpreting an abnormal signal can lead to making a high-risk decision in terms of sensors' applications. Deep learning algorithms are effective tools for anomaly detection due to their capability to address imbalanced datasets. In this study, we took a semi-supervised learning approach, utilizing normal data for training the deep learning neural networks, in order to address the diverse and unknown features of anomalies. We developed autoencoder-based prediction models to automatically detect anomalous data recorded by three electrochemical aptasensors, with variations in the signals' lengths for particular concentrations, analytes, and bioreceptors. Prediction models employed autoencoder networks and the kernel density estimation (KDE) method for finding the threshold to detect anomalies. Moreover, the autoencoder networks were vanilla, unidirectional long short-term memory (ULSTM), and bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM) autoencoders for the training stage of the prediction models. However, the decision-making was based on the result of these three networks and the integration of vanilla and LSTM networks' results. The accuracy as a performance metric of anomaly prediction models showed that the performance of vanilla and integrated models were comparable, while the LSTM-based autoencoder models showed the least accuracy. Considering the integrated model of ULSTM and vanilla autoencoder, the accuracy for the dataset with the lengthier signals was approximately 80%, while it was 65% and 40% for the other datasets. The lowest accuracy belonged to the dataset with the least normal data in its dataset. These results demonstrate that the proposed vanilla and integrated models can automatically detect abnormal data when there is sufficient normal data for training the models.

Indexed as

autoencoder (AE)kernel density estimation (KDE)long short-term memory (LSTM)LSTM-based autoencoderoutlier detectionsemi-supervised learningsignal processingtime series anomaly detectionvanilla autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID37106591
PMCPMC10136265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.