ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Tumor Cellularity Assessment of Breast Histopathological Slides via Instance Segmentation and Pathomic Features Explainability.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-based tumor cellularity assessment in digital pathology: A review of methods, datasets, and clinical translation.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Ovarian Endometriosis Imaging: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Emerging Evidence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Unveiling key pathomic features for automated diagnosis and Gleason grade estimation in prostate cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Breast cancer detection based on histological images using fusion of diffusion model outputs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Histopathology in focus: a review on explainable multi-modal approaches for breast cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- An Explainable Radiogenomic Framework to Predict Mutational Status of KRAS and EGFR in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Tumor Cellularity Assessment of Breast Histopathological Slides via Instance Segmentation and Pathomic Features Explainability.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Machine learning in onco-pharmacogenomics: a path to precision medicine with many challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The segmentation and classification of cell nuclei are pivotal steps in the pipelines for the analysis of bioimages. Deep learning (DL) approaches are leading the digital pathology field in the context of nuclei detection and classification. Nevertheless, the features that are exploited by DL models to make their predictions are difficult to interpret, hindering the deployment of such methods in clinical practice. On the other hand, pathomic features can be linked to an easier description of the characteristics exploited by the classifiers for making the final predictions. Thus, in this work, we developed an explainable computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system that can be used to support pathologists in the evaluation of tumor cellularity in breast histopathological slides. In particular, we compared an end-to-end DL approach that exploits the Mask R-CNN instance segmentation architecture with a two steps pipeline, where the features are extracted while considering the morphological and textural characteristics of the cell nuclei. Classifiers that are based on support vector machines and artificial neural networks are trained on top of these features in order to discriminate between tumor and non-tumor nuclei. Afterwards, the SHAP (Shapley additive explanations) explainable artificial intelligence technique was employed to perform a feature importance analysis, which led to an understanding of the features processed by the machine learning models for making their decisions. An expert pathologist validated the employed feature set, corroborating the clinical usability of the model. Even though the models resulting from the two-stage pipeline are slightly less accurate than those of the end-to-end approach, the interpretability of their features is clearer and may help build trust for pathologists to adopt artificial intelligence-based CAD systems in their clinical workflow. To further show the validity of the proposed approach, it has been tested on an external validation dataset, which was collected from IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" and made publicly available to ease research concerning the quantification of tumor cellularity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.