Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106583›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Tumor Cellularity Assessment of Breast Histopathological Slides via Instance Segmentation and Pathomic Features Explainability.

Nicola Altini, Emilia Puro, Maria Giovanna Taccogna, Francescomaria Marino, Simona De Summa, Concetta Saponaro, Eliseo Mattioli, Francesco Alfredo Zito, Vitoantonio Bevilacqua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicola AltiniDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Edoardo Orabona n. 4, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7353-4968
Emilia PuroDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Edoardo Orabona n. 4, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2912-240X
Maria Giovanna TaccognaDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Edoardo Orabona n. 4, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6996-7920
Francescomaria MarinoDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Edoardo Orabona n. 4, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4919-5403
Simona De SummaMolecular Diagnostics and Pharmacogenetics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Via O. Flacco n. 65, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9607-3754
Concetta SaponaroLaboratory of Preclinical and Translational Research, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata (IRCCS-CROB), Via Padre Pio n. 1, 85028 Rionero in Vulture, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8196-3583
Eliseo MattioliPathology Department, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Via O. Flacco n. 65, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2456-7867
Francesco Alfredo ZitoPathology Department, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Via O. Flacco n. 65, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4140-4020
Vitoantonio BevilacquaDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Edoardo Orabona n. 4, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3088-0788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The segmentation and classification of cell nuclei are pivotal steps in the pipelines for the analysis of bioimages. Deep learning (DL) approaches are leading the digital pathology field in the context of nuclei detection and classification. Nevertheless, the features that are exploited by DL models to make their predictions are difficult to interpret, hindering the deployment of such methods in clinical practice. On the other hand, pathomic features can be linked to an easier description of the characteristics exploited by the classifiers for making the final predictions. Thus, in this work, we developed an explainable computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system that can be used to support pathologists in the evaluation of tumor cellularity in breast histopathological slides. In particular, we compared an end-to-end DL approach that exploits the Mask R-CNN instance segmentation architecture with a two steps pipeline, where the features are extracted while considering the morphological and textural characteristics of the cell nuclei. Classifiers that are based on support vector machines and artificial neural networks are trained on top of these features in order to discriminate between tumor and non-tumor nuclei. Afterwards, the SHAP (Shapley additive explanations) explainable artificial intelligence technique was employed to perform a feature importance analysis, which led to an understanding of the features processed by the machine learning models for making their decisions. An expert pathologist validated the employed feature set, corroborating the clinical usability of the model. Even though the models resulting from the two-stage pipeline are slightly less accurate than those of the end-to-end approach, the interpretability of their features is clearer and may help build trust for pathologists to adopt artificial intelligence-based CAD systems in their clinical workflow. To further show the validity of the proposed approach, it has been tested on an external validation dataset, which was collected from IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" and made publicly available to ease research concerning the quantification of tumor cellularity.

Indexed as

explainable artificial intelligenceinstance segmentationnuclei detectiontumor cellularity

Identifiers

PMID37106583
PMCPMC10135772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.