Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106461›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

Can elderly individuals perform partial weight bearing on their lower limbs? A prospective cohort study using ambulatory real-time biofeedback.

Tobias Peter Merkle, Nina Hofmann, Christian Knop, Tomas Da Silva

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. [Biphasic plate-Controlled instability in fracture healing].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Conservative fracture treatment in old people].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tobias Peter MerkleDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Klinikum Stuttgart - Katharinenhospital, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany. t.merkle@klinikum-stuttgart.de.
Nina HofmannDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Klinikum Stuttgart - Katharinenhospital, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Christian KnopDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Klinikum Stuttgart - Katharinenhospital, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Tomas Da SilvaDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Klinikum Stuttgart - Katharinenhospital, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Klinikum Stuttgart · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPartial weight bearing in an orthosis and with forearm crutches is a widespread and well-accepted therapeutic principle after an injury of the lower extremity during early rehabilitation. Complying may be challenging to do under these circumstances, especially for elderly people. This study compares the spatiotemporal parameters and peak loads performed by a group of older participants before and after activating real-time biofeedback (BF) to determine whether they benefit from a biofeedback.

methodsTwenty-four healthy subjects between 61 and 80 years learned how to walk using forearm crutches in a lower leg orthosis while performing a weight of 20 kg using a bathroom scale with the aim of loading in a zone between 15 and 30 kg. After that, they completed a course that was on level ground (50 m) and another course on stairs (11 steps). They did a walk without BF first, and then with BF. Each step was given a maximum load, which was determined and statistically checked. In addition, spatiotemporal parameters were collected.

resultsThe classical teaching method with a bathroom scale was ineffective. Only 32.3% of the loads could be adequately carried by a person on level ground in the 15-30 kg target zone. On the stairs, it was 48.2% and 34.3%, respectively. Thus, on level ground, 52.7% of loads exceeded 30 kg. Downstairs it was 46.4%, and upstairs it was 41.6%. Subjects clearly benefit from activated biofeedback. Biofeedback significantly reduced missteps > 30 kg in every course. The loads decreased significantly to 25.0% on level ground, to 23.0% upstairs, and to 24.4% downstairs. At the same time, speed and stride length decreased per course while total time increased.

conclusionPartial weight bearing is more complex and difficult for the elderly. These study results may help better understand 3-point gait in older adults in an outpatient setting. When partial weight bearing is recommended, special follow-up attention must be given for this group. Age-based therapy strategies can be developed and monitored with the assistance of ambulatory biofeedback devices. Trial registration Retrospectively registered, https://www.drks.de/DRKS00031136 .

Indexed as

GaitPartial Weight-BearingAgedBiofeedback, PsychologyHumansLegProspective StudiesWeight-BearingBiofeedbackElderlyOrthosisPartial weight bearingRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37106461
PMCPMC10142256
OpenAlexW4367176391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.