Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106353›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Learning curve of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and its effects on implant position in asian patients: a prospective study.

Ho Jung Jung, Min Wook Kang, Jong Hwa Lee, Joong Il Kim

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Update.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ho Jung Jung *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Min Wook Kang *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jong Hwa LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Joong Il KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jungil@hanmail.net.
Hallym University · KRHallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (r-TKA) can reportedly achieve more accurate implant positioning than conventional total knee arthroplasty (c-TKA), although its learning curve is controversial. Moreover, few studies have investigated r-TKA in Asians, who have different anatomical characteristics. This study aimed to determine the learning curve for r-TKA and compare implant positions between r-TKA and c-TKA according to the learning curve in Asian patients.

methodsThis prospective study included 50 consecutive c-TKAs (group C), followed by 50 consecutive r-TKAs conducted using the MAKO robotic system (Stryker, USA). Cumulative summation analyses were performed to assess the learning curve for operative time in r-TKA. Accordingly, the r-TKA cases were divided into the initial (group I) and proficiency cases (group P). The femoral and tibial component positions in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes and lower limb alignment were compared among the three groups.

resultsr-TKA was associated with a learning curve for operative time in 18 cases. The operative time was significantly shorter in groups C and P than that in group I, with no significant difference between groups C and P. Groups I and P demonstrated fewer outliers with respect to lower limb alignment, femoral component coronal position, axial position, and tibial component sagittal position than those in group C, with no significant difference between groups I and P.

conclusionThe operative time did not differ significantly between r-TKA and c-TKA after the learning curve. Surgeons could expect more accurate and reproducible lower limb alignment and implant positioning with r-TKA in Asian patients, irrespective of the learning curve.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansKnee JointLearning CurveProspective StudiesTibiaLearning curveLower limb alignmentOperative timeRobotic surgeryTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID37106353
PMCPMC10134614
OpenAlexW4367183968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.