Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106350›Full record

ReviewMalaria journal2023

Reactive surveillance and response strategies for malaria elimination in Myanmar: a literature review.

Win Htike, Nay Yi Yi Linn, Kyawt Mon Win, Lae Shwe Sin Myint, May Chan Oo, Ei Phyu Htwe, Aung Khine Zaw, Katherine O'Flaherty, Paul A Agius, Ellen A Kearney and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Win HtikeHealth Security and Malaria Program, Burnet Institute Myanmar, Yangon, Myanmar. win.htike@burnet.edu.au.
Nay Yi Yi LinnDepartment of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
Kyawt Mon WinDepartment of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
Lae Shwe Sin MyintDepartment of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
May Chan OoHealth Security and Malaria Program, Burnet Institute Myanmar, Yangon, Myanmar.
Ei Phyu HtweHealth Security and Malaria Program, Burnet Institute Myanmar, Yangon, Myanmar.
Aung Khine ZawHealth Security and Malaria Program, Burnet Institute Myanmar, Yangon, Myanmar.
Katherine O'FlahertyDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, 3004, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Paul A AgiusBiostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ellen A KearneyDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, 3004, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Freya J I FowkesDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, 3004, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Win Han OoHealth Security and Malaria Program, Burnet Institute Myanmar, Yangon, Myanmar. winhan.oo@burnet.edu.au.

Funding

International funding organization QSE-M-UNOPS-BI-20864-007-61
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myanmar, a country in Greater Mekong Sub-region, aims to eliminate malaria by 2030. To achieve malaria elimination, Myanmar adopted a reactive surveillance and response strategy of malaria case notification within 1 day and case investigation, foci investigation and response activities within 7 days. A literature review was conducted to gain a better understanding of how the reactive surveillance and response strategies are being implemented in Myanmar including enablers and barriers to their implementation. Only two assessments of the completeness and timeliness of reactive surveillance and response strategy in Myanmar have been published to date. The proportion of positive cases notified within one day was 27.9% and the proportion of positive cases investigated within 7 days as recommended by the national guidelines varied from 32.5 to 91.8% under different settings in reported studies. Strong collaboration between the National Malaria Control Programme and implementing partners, and adequate human resource and financial support contributed to a successful and timely implementation of reactive surveillance and response strategy. Documented enablers for successful implementation of reactive surveillance and response strategy included frontline health workers having good knowledge of reactive surveillance and response activities and availability of Basic Health Staff for timely implementation of foci response activities. Barriers for implementation of reactive surveillance and response activities were also identified, including shortage of human resources especially in hard-to-reach settings, limited mobile phone network services and internet coverage leading to delays in timely notification of malaria cases, lengthy and complex case investigation forms and different reporting systems between Basic Health Staff and volunteers.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneMalariaHealth PersonnelHumansMyanmar1-3-7 strategyMalaria eliminationReactive surveillance and response

Identifiers

PMID37106350
PMCPMC10141915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.