Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2023
Effect of anesthesia administration method on apgar scores of infants born to women undergoing elective cesarean section.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04733157 (The Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Preventing Postpartum Haemorrhage After Caesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Preventing Postpartum Haemorrhage After Caesarean Section
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refractory Uterine Atony After Sequential Neuraxial Opioid Administration-A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Mode of Anesthesia During Cesarean Section and Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality: A Cohort Study.Local and regional anesthesia · 2026Article
- Simulation of Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion up to Time of Delivery in Cesarean Section: A Bench Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Esketamine combined with low-dose propofol induction strategy for category-1 cesarean section: a case series.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- The Impact of Maternal Spinal Anesthesia on Newborn Out-Comes: A Clinical Perspective.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Impact of the Delivery Method on Oxidative Stress in Neonates: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of general vs. neuraxial anesthesia on neonatal outcomes in non-elective cesarean sections.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- ObsTIVA-UK: a service evaluation of obstetric total intravenous anaesthesia in the United Kingdom.Anaesthesia reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeonatal health at delivery as measured by apgar scores is an important outcome. This study was done to assess the impact of anesthesia on Apgar 1-minute and 5-minute scores of infants delivered through elective cesarean section in Zimbabwe.
methodsWe carried out a secondary analysis of data from the Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage (ETAPPH) clinical trial in Zimbabwe. Outcomes measured were infant Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, exposure was the administration of either a general (intravenous propofol/ketamine/sodium thiopental) or spinal (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%) anesthesia for anesthesia during the elective cesarean section procedure. Marginal Structural Logistic Modelling (MSM) using an unstabilized Inverse Probability Treatment Weight (IPTW) estimator was used to assess the relationship between anesthetic administration method and infant Apgar scores.
resultsFour hundred and twenty-one (421) women who had an elective caesarean section in the ETAPPH study had their infants assessed for Apgar scores. Comparing general anesthesia to spinal anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was related to good Apgar scores at 1-minute (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.0, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.5-10.7, sensitivity analysis E-value = 3.41). Spinal anesthetic administration was also related to good Apgar scores at 5 min (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.2, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.6-23.1, sensitivity analysis E-value = 4.42).
conclusionsWhen providing anesthesia for patients undergoing elective cesarean section, care should be taken on the method of administration of anesthetic agents. General anesthesia tends to depress Apgar scores at 1 min, although most neonates recover and have better scores at 5 min. Spinal anesthesia should be the first choice whenever possible.
trial registrationThe clinical trial from which data of this study was abstracted was registered under clinical trials registration number NCT04733157.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.