Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106318›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

An Australian aged care home for people subject to homelessness: health, wellbeing and cost-benefit.

Claire M C O'Connor, Roslyn G Poulos, Anurag Sharma, Costanza Preti, Najwa L Reynolds, Allison C Rowlands, Kyall Flakelar, Angela Raguz, Peter Valpiani, Steven G Faux and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  5. Tackling late-life homelessness in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Claire M C O'ConnorCentre for Positive Ageing, HammondCare, Sydney, Australia. claire.oconnor@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3541-708X
Roslyn G PoulosSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Anurag SharmaSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Costanza PretiCentre for Positive Ageing, HammondCare, Sydney, Australia.
Najwa L ReynoldsCentre for Positive Ageing, HammondCare, Sydney, Australia.
Allison C RowlandsCentre for Positive Ageing, HammondCare, Sydney, Australia.
Kyall FlakelarSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Angela RaguzCentre for Positive Ageing, HammondCare, Sydney, Australia.
Peter ValpianiHaymarket Foundation, Sydney, Australia.
Steven G FauxDepartments of Rehabilitation Medicine and Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Michael BoyerChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia.
Jacqueline C T CloseNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Leena GuptaSydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Christopher J PoulosCentre for Positive Ageing, HammondCare, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder people subject to homelessness face many challenges including poor health status, geriatric syndromes, and depression, coupled with barriers in accessing health and aged care services. Many are in need of formal aged care at a younger age than the general population, yet, in Australia, specialised aged-care services to support this vulnerable cohort are limited.

methodsThis study was an evaluation of a new purpose-built aged care home for people with high care needs and who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. Over the first 12 months post-admission, the study examined: (1) changes in residents' physical, mental, psychological and social health, and (2) the costs incurred by the study cohort, including any cost benefit derived.

resultsThirty-five residents enrolled in the study between March 2020 - April 2021. At admission, almost half of residents were within the range for dementia, the majority were frail, at high risk for falls, and had scores indicative of depression. Over time, linear mixed-effect models showed significant improvement in personal wellbeing scores, with clinically significant improvements in overall health related quality of life. Levels of physical functional independence, frailty, and global cognition were stable, but cognitive functional ability declined over time. Comparison of 12 month pre- and post- admission cost utility data for a smaller cohort (n = 13) for whom complete data were available, suggested an average per resident saving of approximately AU$32,000, while the QALY indicators remained stable post-admission.

conclusionWhile this was a small study with no control group, these preliminary positive outcomes add to the growing body of evidence that supports the need for dedicated services to support older people subject to homelessness.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedIll-Housed PersonsAgedAustralasian PeopleAustraliaCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansQuality of LifeAged careCost–benefitHealthHomelessnessService evaluationTrauma informed careWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID37106318
PMCPMC10139912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.