Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106277›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Radiation, Lymph Node Dissection, or Both: Management of Lymph Node Micrometastases from Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Kevin L Ma, Cimarron E Sharon, Gabriella N Tortorello, Nikhita J Perry, Luke J Keele, John N Lukens, Giorgos C Karakousis, John T Miura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. [Merkel cell carcinoma: current surgical approaches and multidisciplinary treatment].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin L MaDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-3269
Cimarron E SharonDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gabriella N TortorelloDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nikhita J PerryUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Luke J KeeleDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John N LukensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Giorgos C Karakousis *Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. giorgos.karakousis@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
John T Miura *Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegional lymph node micrometastases from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) can be treated with completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and/or radiation therapy (RT). It is unclear how these options compare in terms of survival benefits for patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from years 2012-2019 of the National Cancer Database. Patients with MCC and clinically negative, but pathologically positive, lymph node metastases who received RT to and/or CLND of the regional lymph node basin were included. Inverse probability weight balancing was performed using covariates followed by Cox proportional hazards modeling for survival analysis.

resultsA total of 962 patients were included [median (interquartile range) age, 74 (67-80) years, 662 (68.8%) male patients, 926 (96.3%) white patients]. The majority (63%, n = 606) had a CLND only, while 18% (n = 173) had RT only, and 19% (n = 183) had both CLND and RT. From 2016 to 2019, usage of RT only increased from 10% to 31.8%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment modality was not associated with survival [RT versus CLND, hazard ratio (HR) 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.621-1.142, p = 0.269, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.029, 95% CI 0.775-1.367, p = 0.844]. This persisted after balancing weights (RT versus CLND, HR 0.837, 95% CI 0.614-1.142, p = 0.262, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.085, 95% CI 0.801-1.470, p = 0.599).

conclusionsThe usage of RT for nodal micrometastasis in MCC is increasing as compared with CLND. This strategy appears to be safe, with no significant difference in survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Merkel CellSkin NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleNeoplasm MicrometastasisRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.