Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106268›Full record

Observational studyObesity surgery2023

The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice.

Stefan Ulbing, Lukas Infanger, Edith Fleischmann, Gerhard Prager, Thomas Hamp

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Obesity surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effect of opioid-freeBJA open · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan UlbingDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Lukas InfangerDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Edith FleischmannDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard PragerDivision of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas HampDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. thomas.hamp@gmx.at.ORCID 0000-0001-7294-9168
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOpioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is an alternative to conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Several small studies and a meta-analysis have suggested advantages of OFA for bariatric surgery, but current evidence is still contradictory, and a universally accepted concept has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing bariatric surgery experience less postoperative pain and better postoperative recovery when anesthetized with an OFA regimen than with an OBA regimen. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective observational cohort study, conducted between October 2020 and July 2021, compared patients receiving OFA with patients receiving OBA. Patients were visited 24 and 48 h after the surgical procedure and asked about their postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Additionally, the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40) and the postoperative opioid requirements were recorded.

resultsNinety-nine patients were included and analyzed in this study (OFA: N = 50; OBA: N = 49). The OFA cohort exhibited less postoperative pain than the OBA cohort within 24 h (VAS median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 2.2 [1-4.4] vs. 4.1 [2-6.5]; P ≤ 0.001) and 48 h (VAS median [IQR]: 1.9 [0.4-4.1] vs. 3.1 [1.4-5.8]; P ≤ 0.001) postoperatively. Additionally, the OFA cohort had higher QoR-40 scores and required less opioid therapy postoperatively.

conclusionBased on our results the use of OFA for bariatric surgery results in less pain, reduced opioid requirements, and improved postoperative recovery-adding additional evidence regarding the use of OFA in everyday clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaBariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidAnalgesics, OpioidHumansPostoperative PainProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidBariatric surgeryClinical practiceOpioid-free anesthesiaPostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID37106268
PMCPMC10234923
OpenAlexW4367175491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.