Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106214›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2023

Body weight loss as a prognostic and predictive factor in previously treated patients with metastatic gastric cancer: post hoc analyses of the randomized phase III TAGS trial.

Michele Ghidini, Howard Hochster, Toshihiko Doi, Eric Van Cutsem, Lukas Makris, Osamu Takahashi, Karim A Benhadji, Wasat Mansoor

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Michele GhidiniOncology Division, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Cremona, Azienda Ospedaliera di Cremona, Viale Concordia 1, 26100, Cremona, Italy. micheleghidini@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5435-1218
Howard HochsterGastrointestinal Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Toshihiko DoiDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Eric Van CutsemDigestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuvain, Belgium.
Lukas MakrisStathmi, Inc, New Hope, PA, USA.
Osamu TakahashiTaiho Oncology, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Karim A BenhadjiTaiho Oncology, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Wasat MansoorDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Taiho Oncology (United States) · USHope Foundation · USIstituti Ospitalieri di Cremona · ITNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBody weight loss (BWL) is a negative prognostic factor in metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC). In the phase III TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil improved survival versus placebo in third- or later-line mGC/GEJC. These retrospective analyses examined the association of early BWL with survival outcomes in TAGS.

methodsEfficacy and safety were assessed in patients who experienced < 3% or ≥ 3% BWL from treatment start until day 1 of cycle 2 (early BWL). The effect of early BWL on overall survival (OS) was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

resultsBody weight data were available for 451 of 507 (89%) patients in TAGS. In the trifluridine/tipiracil and placebo arms, respectively, 74% (224/304) and 65% (95/147) experienced < 3% BWL, whereas 26% (80/304) and 35% (52/147) experienced ≥ 3% BWL at cycle 1 end. Median OS was longer in < 3% BWL versus ≥ 3% BWL subgroups (6.5 vs 4.9 months for trifluridine/tipiracil; 6.0 vs 2.5 months for placebo). In univariate analyses, an unadjusted HR of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46-0.73) for the < 3% vs ≥ 3% BWL subgroup indicated a strong prognostic effect of early BWL. Multivariate analyses confirmed early BWL as both prognostic (P < 0.0001) and predictive (interaction P = 0.0003) for OS. Similar results were obtained for progression-free survival. Any-cause grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 77% and 82% of trifluridine/tipiracil-treated and 45% and 67% of placebo-treated patients with < 3% and ≥ 3% BWL, respectively.

conclusionsIn TAGS, early BWL was a strong negative prognostic factor for OS in patients with mGC/GEJC receiving third- or later-line treatment.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug CombinationsHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTrifluridineUracilWeight LossDrug CombinationsTrifluridineUracilBody weight lossGastric cancer; gastroesophageal junction cancerPrognostic factorTrifluridine tipiracil

Identifiers

PMID37106214
PMCPMC10284730
OpenAlexW4367318463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.