Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106092›Full record

ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2023

[Differential diagnoses of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid].

Philipp Steven

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Philipp StevenKompetenzzentrum für okuläre GVHD, Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpenerstrasse 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. philipp.steven@uk-koeln.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overall, conjunctival scarring is rare and often overlooked during routine examination. However, the differential diagnostic distinction of cicatricial mucous membrane pemphigoid from other causes is crucial for further treatment planning. Other entities that lead to conjunctival scarring, are ocular rosacea, ocular graft-versus-host disease, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, infections, trauma and further sometimes very rare diseases. Most of these differential diagnoses have in common that conjunctival scarring does not progress indefinitely if untreated, in contrast to mucous membrane pemphigoid.

Indexed as

Pemphigoid, Benign Mucous MembranePemphigoid, BullousCicatrixConjunctivaDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMucous MembraneConjunctivaGraft-versus-host diseaseMucous membrane pemphigoidRosaceaScarring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.