ArticlePediatric radiology2023
Association of pancreatic fat on imaging with pediatric metabolic co-morbidities.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conceptual framework and expert guidance on intrapancreatic fat deposition: the Melbourne consensus.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Multinuclear NMR and MRI Beyond Proton Imaging: Principles, Contrast Mechanisms, and Applications in Materials and Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Pancreatic Cancer Detection in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN)-New Insights.Cancers · 2025Review
- Relationship Between Liver Steatosis, Pancreas Steatosis, Metabolic Comorbidities, and Subclinical Vascular Markers in Children with Obesity: An Imaging-Based Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Understanding the association of intrapancreatic fat deposition with adiposity and components of metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Practical approach to quantitative liver and pancreas MRI in children.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Linearity and bias of proton density fat fraction across the full dynamic range of 0-100%: a multiplatform, multivendor phantom study using 1.5T and 3T MRI at two sites.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between pancreatic fat on imaging and metabolic co-morbidities has not been established in pediatrics. We sought to investigate the relationship between pancreatic fat measured by MRI and endocrine/exocrine dysfunctions along with the metabolic co-morbidities in a cohort of children.
objectiveTo investigate relationships between pancreatic fat quantified by MRI and endocrine and exocrine conditions and metabolic co-morbidities in a cohort of children. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective review of pediatric patients (n = 187) who had a clinically indicated MRI examination between May 2018 and February 2020. After 51 patients without useable imaging data were excluded, the remaining 136 subjects comprised the study sample. Laboratory studies were assessed if collected within 6 months of MRI and patient charts were reviewed for demographic and clinical information. MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF) sequence had been acquired according to manufacturer's specified parameters at a slice thickness of 3 mm. Two blinded radiologists independently collected PDFF data.
resultsThe median age at MRI was 12.1 (IQR: 9.0-14.8) years and the majority of patients were Caucasian (79%), followed by African American and Hispanic at 12% and 11% respectively. There was a higher median pancreas fat fraction in patients with exocrine conditions (chronic pancreatitis or exocrine insufficiency) compared to those without (3.5% vs 2.2%, p = 0.03). There was also a higher median fat fraction in the head of pancreas in patients with endocrine insufficient conditions (insulin resistance, pre-diabetes, type 1 and type 2 diabetes) compared to those without endocrine insufficiency when excluding patients with active acute pancreatitis (3.5% vs 2.0%, p = 0.04). Patients with BMI > 85% had higher mean fat fraction compared to patients with BMI ≤ 85% (head: 3.8 vs 2.4%, p = 0.01; body: 3.8 vs 2.5%, p = 0.005; tail: 3.7 vs 2.7%, p = 0.049; overall pancreas fat fraction: 3.8 vs 2.6%, p = 0.002).
conclusionPancreas fat is elevated in patients with BMI > 85% and in those with exocrine and endocrine insufficiencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.