Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37106068›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The cost-effectiveness of whole genome sequencing in neurodevelopmental disorders.

Hannes Runheim, Maria Pettersson, Anna Hammarsjö, Ann Nordgren, Martin Henriksson, Anna Lindstrand, Lars-Åke Levin, Maria Johansson Soller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mastering genetics for your clinic: A step-by-step guide.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hannes RunheimDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria PetterssonDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna HammarsjöDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ann NordgrenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin HenrikssonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna Lindstrand *Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. anna.lindstrand@ki.se.
Lars-Åke Levin *Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria Johansson Soller *Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SELinköping University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has the potential to be a comprehensive genetic test, especially relevant for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders, syndromes and congenital malformations. However, the cost consequences of using whole genome sequencing as a first-line genetic test for these individuals are not well understood. The study objective was to compare the healthcare costs and diagnostic yield when WGS is performed as the first-line test instead of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Two cohorts were analyzed retrospectively using register data, cohort CMA (418 patients referred for CMA at the department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, during 2015) and cohort WGS (89 patients included in a WGS-first prospective study in 2017). The analysis compared healthcare consumption over a 2-year period after referral for genetic testing, the diagnostic yield over a 2- and 3-year period after referral was also compiled. The mean healthcare cost per patient in cohort WGS was $2,339 lower compared to cohort CMA ($ - 2339, 95% CI - 12,238-7561; P = 0.64) including higher costs for genetic investigations ($1065, 95% CI 834-1295; P < 0.001) and lower costs for outpatient care ($ - 2330, 95% CI - 3992 to (- 669); P = 0.006). The diagnostic yield was 23% higher for cohort WGS (cohort CMA 20.1%, cohort WGS 24.7%) (0.046, 95% CI - 0.053-0.145; P = 0.36). WGS as a first-line diagnostic test for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders is associated with statistically non-significant lower costs and higher diagnostic yield compared with CMA. This indicates that prioritizing WGS over CMA in health care decision making will yield positive expected outcomes as well as showing a need for further research.

Indexed as

Neurodevelopmental DisordersCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37106068
PMCPMC10140052
OpenAlexW4367179485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.