ArticleCommunications chemistry2023
Automated relative binding free energy calculations from SMILES to ΔΔG.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking Docking Protocols on Predicting Alternative Binding Modes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Large-Scale Collaborative Assessment of Binding Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery Using OpenFE.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Molecular Dynamics Workflows to Compute Large-Scale Sets of Absolute Binding Free Energies Aiding Drug Candidate and Binding Pose Selection.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- An Automated Workflow for Diagnosing Sampling Issues Caused by Slow Torsional Motions in Molecular Simulations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- BindFlow: A Free, User-Friendly Pipeline for Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations Using Free Energy Perturbation or MM(PB/GB)SA.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Integrated framework for targeting dynamic penicillin-binding protein 2a via ensemble structural biology and deep generative modeling.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- An efficient computational chemistry approach to generating negative data for drug discovery pipeline validation.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Navigating structure-based drug discovery with emerging innovations in physics- and knowledge-based approaches.npj drug discovery · 2025Review
- The digital transformation in pharmacy: embracing online platforms and the cosmeceutical paradigm shift.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In drug discovery, computational methods are a key part of making informed design decisions and prioritising experiments. In particular, optimizing compound affinity is a central concern during the early stages of development. In the last 10 years, alchemical free energy (FE) calculations have transformed our ability to incorporate accurate in silico potency predictions in design decisions, and represent the 'gold standard' for augmenting experiment-driven drug discovery. However, relative FE calculations are complex to set up, require significant expert intervention to prepare the calculation and analyse the results or are provided only as closed-source software, not allowing for fine-grained control over the underlying settings. In this work, we introduce an end-to-end relative FE workflow based on the non-equilibrium switching approach that facilitates calculation of binding free energies starting from SMILES strings. The workflow is implemented using fully modular steps, allowing various components to be exchanged depending on licence availability. We further investigate the dependence of the calculated free energy accuracy on the initial ligand pose generated by various docking algorithms. We show that both commercial and open-source docking engines can be used to generate poses that lead to good correlation of free energies with experimental reference data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.