ArticleScientific reports2023
Computer-aided detection of arrhythmogenic sites in post-ischemic ventricular tachycardia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-Dimensional Perspective on Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate: Critical Conduction Abnormalities as Ablation Targets and Implications for Procedural Endpoints.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- The ARGO dataset: Annotated and delineated intracardiac electrograms of post-ischemic ventricular tachycardia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Evolution of Human Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia Mapping for Exploring Mechanisms of Reentry Circuits.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Clinically Oriented Review with Engineering Primers.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Machine learning approach for automated localization of ventricular tachycardia ablation targets from substrate maps: development and validation in a porcine model.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- AI in the EP lab - mapping, imaging, and signal interpretation.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, catheter-based ablation in patients with post-ischemic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is performed in arrhythmogenic sites identified by electrophysiologists by visual inspection during electroanatomic mapping. This work aims to present the development of machine learning tools aiming at supporting clinicians in the identification of arrhythmogenic sites by exploiting innovative features that belong to different domains. This study included 1584 bipolar electrograms from nine patients affected by post-ischemic VT. Different features were extracted in the time, time scale, frequency, and spatial domains and used to train different supervised classifiers. Classification results showed high performance, revealing robustness across the different classifiers in terms of accuracy, true positive, and false positive rates. The combination of multi-domain features with the ensemble tree is the most effective solution, exhibiting accuracies above 93% in the 10-time 10-fold cross-validation and 84% in the leave-one-subject-out validation. Results confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed features and their potential use in a computer-aided system for the detection of arrhythmogenic sites. This work demonstrates for the first time the usefulness of supervised machine learning for the detection of arrhythmogenic sites in post-ischemic VT patients, thus enabling the development of computer-aided systems to reduce operator dependence and errors, thereby possibly improving clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.