Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37105998›Full record

ReviewNature communications2023

Engineering protein-based therapeutics through structural and chemical design.

Sasha B Ebrahimi, Devleena Samanta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 156 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A novel CXCL8(3-72) K11R/G31P-BPIEmerging microbes & infections · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lipocalin 13 Mitigates Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Through Inhibiting the ADRB2/ERK Signalling Pathway.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Programmable DNA Assemblies Reconstitute Supramolecular Protein Function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sasha B EbrahimiDrug Product Development-Steriles, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA. sasha.b.ebrahimi@gsk.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2752-5109
Devleena SamantaDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. dsamanta@utexas.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0647-7673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-based therapeutics have led to new paradigms in disease treatment. Projected to be half of the top ten selling drugs in 2023, proteins have emerged as rivaling and, in some cases, superior alternatives to historically used small molecule-based medicines. This review chronicles both well-established and emerging design strategies that have enabled this paradigm shift by transforming protein-based structures that are often prone to denaturation, degradation, and aggregation in vitro and in vivo into highly effective therapeutics. In particular, we discuss strategies for creating structures with increased affinity and targetability, enhanced in vivo stability and pharmacokinetics, improved cell permeability, and reduced amounts of undesired immunogenicity.

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID37105998
PMCPMC10132957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.