Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37105972›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

What the geological past can tell us about the future of the ocean's twilight zone.

Katherine A Crichton, Jamie D Wilson, Andy Ridgwell, Flavia Boscolo-Galazzo, Eleanor H John, Bridget S Wade, Paul N Pearson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine A CrichtonSchool of Earth and Environmental Science, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. k.a.crichton@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8748-0438
Jamie D WilsonSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7509-4791
Andy RidgwellDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2333-0128
Flavia Boscolo-GalazzoSchool of Earth and Environmental Science, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5146-5321
Eleanor H JohnSchool of Earth and Environmental Science, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Bridget S WadeDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7245-8614
Paul N PearsonSchool of Earth and Environmental Science, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4628-9818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paleontological reconstructions of plankton community structure during warm periods of the Cenozoic (last 66 million years) reveal that deep-dwelling 'twilight zone' (200-1000 m) plankton were less abundant and diverse, and lived much closer to the surface, than in colder, more recent climates. We suggest that this is a consequence of temperature's role in controlling the rate that sinking organic matter is broken down and metabolized by bacteria, a process that occurs faster at warmer temperatures. In a warmer ocean, a smaller fraction of organic matter reaches the ocean interior, affecting food supply and dissolved oxygen availability at depth. Using an Earth system model that has been evaluated against paleo observations, we illustrate how anthropogenic warming may impact future carbon cycling and twilight zone ecology. Our findings suggest that significant changes are already underway, and without strong emissions mitigation, widespread ecological disruption in the twilight zone is likely by 2100, with effects spanning millennia thereafter.

Indexed as

PlanktonSeawaterCarbon CycleOceans and SeasTemperature

Identifiers

PMID37105972
PMCPMC10140295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.