ArticleThoracic cancer2023
Prognostic impact of noninvasive areas in resected pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Wedge Resection of Pulmonary in Patients with Small Volume Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024Article
- Prognostic impact of noninvasive areas in resected pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
main problemsIn non-small-cell lung cancer, ground-glass opacity on computed tomography imaging reflects pathological noninvasiveness and is a favorable prognostic factor. However, the significance of pathological noninvasive areas (NIAs) has not been fully revealed. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of NIAs on lung adenocarcinoma.
methodsWe analyzed 402 patients with pathological stage (p-Stage) IA lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery in 2013-2016 at two institutions and examined the association of the presence of NIAs with clinicopathological factors and prognosis. Furthermore, after using propensity-score matching to adjust for clinicopathological factors, such as age, sex, smoking history, pathological invasive area size, pathological T factor (p-T), p-Stage, and histological subtype (lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma [LPA] or non-LPA), the prognostic impact of NIAs was evaluated.
resultsPatients were divided into NIA-present (N = 231) and NIA-absent (N = 171) groups. Multivariable analysis showed that NIA-present was strongly associated with earlier p-T, earlier p-Stage, LPA, and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the NIA-present group displayed a better prognosis than the NIA-absent group in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (5-year DFS 94.6% vs. 87.2%, 5-year OS 97.2% vs. 91.1%). However, after adjusting for clinicopathological factors by propensity score matching, no significant differences in prognosis were identified between the NIA-present and NIA-absent groups (5-year DFS 92.4% vs 89.6%, 5-year OS 95.6% vs 94.3%).
conclusionsOur current study suggests that the prognostic impact of the presence of NIAs on lung adenocarcinoma is due to differences in clinicopathological factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.