ArticleBMJ open2023
Association between gender social norms and cardiovascular disease mortality and life expectancy: an ecological study.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveExamine the association between country-level gender social norms and (1) cardiovascular disease mortality rates; (2) female to male cardiovascular disease mortality ratios; and (3) life expectancy.
designEcological study with the country as the unit of analysis.
settingGlobal, country-level data.
participantsGlobal population of countries with data available on gender social norms as measured by the Gender Social Norms Index (developed by the United Nations Development Programme).
main outcome measuresCountry-level female and male age-standardised cardiovascular disease mortality rates, population age-standardised cardiovascular disease mortality rates, female to male cardiovascular disease mortality ratios, female and male life expectancy at birth. Outcome measure data were retrieved from the WHO and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Multivariable linear regression models were fitted to explore the relationship between gender social norms and the outcome variables.
resultsHigher levels of biased gender social norms, as measured by the Gender Social Norms Index, were associated with higher female, male and population cardiovascular disease mortality rates in the multivariable models (β 4.86, 95% CIs 3.18 to 6.54; β 5.28, 95% CIs 3.42 to 7.15; β 4.89, 95% CIs 3.18 to 6.60), and lower female and male life expectancy (β -0.07, 95% CIs -0.11 to -0.03; β -0.05, 95% CIs -0.10 to -0.01). These results included adjustment within the models for potentially confounding country-level factors including gross domestic product per capita, population mean years of schooling, physicians per 1000 population, year of Gender Social Norms Index data collection and maternal mortality ratio.
conclusionsOur analysis suggests that higher levels of biased gender social norms are associated with higher rates of population cardiovascular disease mortality and lower life expectancy for both sexes. Future research should explore this relationship further, to define its causal role and promote public health action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.