Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37105686›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes.

Gareth Roberts, Adele Cahill, Charlotte Lawthom, Martine Price, Christopher Blyth, Carys Jones, Leah Mc Laughlin, Jane Noyes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gareth RobertsAneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, Gwent, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4496-6539
Adele CahillAneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, Gwent, UK.
Charlotte LawthomAneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, Gwent, UK.
Martine PricePublic Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Christopher BlythAneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, Gwent, UK.
Carys JonesBangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6159-1842
Leah Mc LaughlinBangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0185-6639
Jane NoyesBangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK jane.noyes@bangor.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4238-5984
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board · GBBangor University · GBPublic Health Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is growing recognition that in order to remain sustainable, the UK's National Health Service must deliver the best patient outcomes within available resources. This focus on outcomes relative to cost is the basis of value-based healthcare (VBHC) and has led to interest in the recording of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to measure patient perspectives on the impact of a health condition on their lives. Every health board in Wales is now required to collect PROMS as part of routine care. We will evaluate the VBHC programme implemented in a lead health board. The study aim is to understand what works about PROMs collection, for whom, in what contexts and why in a VBHC context. In addition, we will assess the social value of integrating PROMs collection into routine care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A three-stage mixed-methods study comprising a realist evaluation integrated with social return on investment (SROI) analysis across four conditions; Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, heart failure and cataract surgery. Workstream 1: Development of logic models, informed by a scoping review, documentary analysis, patient and public involvement (PPI), staff and key stakeholder engagement. Workstream 2: Realist evaluation building on multiple data sources from stages 1 to 3 to test and refine the programme theories that arise from the logic model development. Workstream 3: SROI analysis using interview data with patients, staff and carers, stakeholder and PPI engagement, anonymised routinely collected data, and questionnaires to populate a model that will explore the social value generated by the implementation of PROMs. Findings across stages will be validated with key stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by Wales Research Ethics Committee #5 (22/WA/0044). Outcomes will be shared with key stakeholders, published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build on this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial.

Indexed as

State MedicineValue-Based Health CareDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresReview Literature as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesCataract and refractive surgeryEpilepsyHealth policyHeart failureParkinson-s diseaseQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID37105686
PMCPMC10151973
OpenAlexW4367320701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.