Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37105581›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2023

Mechanistically Weighted Metric to Predict In Vivo Antibody-Receptor Occupancy: An Analytical Approach.

Eshita Khera, Jaeyeon Kim, Andrew Stein, Matt Ratanapanichkich, Greg M Thurber

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eshita KheraDepartments of Chemical Engineering (E.K., M.R., G.M.T.) and Biomedical Engineering (G.M.T.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.K., A.S.).
Jaeyeon KimDepartments of Chemical Engineering (E.K., M.R., G.M.T.) and Biomedical Engineering (G.M.T.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.K., A.S.).
Andrew SteinDepartments of Chemical Engineering (E.K., M.R., G.M.T.) and Biomedical Engineering (G.M.T.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.K., A.S.).
Matt RatanapanichkichDepartments of Chemical Engineering (E.K., M.R., G.M.T.) and Biomedical Engineering (G.M.T.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.K., A.S.).
Greg M ThurberDepartments of Chemical Engineering (E.K., M.R., G.M.T.) and Biomedical Engineering (G.M.T.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.K., A.S.) gthurber@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7570-2080
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Maximizing Antibody Drug Conjugate Efficacy through Multiple Mechanisms of ActionR35GM128819 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Greg Thurber · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In situ clinical measurement of receptor occupancy (RO) is challenging, particularly for solid tumors, necessitating the use of mathematical models that predict tumor receptor occupancy to guide dose decisions. A potency metric, average free tissue target to initial target ratio (AFTIR), was previously described based on a mechanistic compartmental model and is informative for near-saturating dose regimens. However, the metric fails at clinically relevant subsaturating antibody doses, as compartmental models cannot capture the spatial heterogeneity of distribution faced by some antibodies in solid tumors. Here we employ a partial differential equation (PDE) Krogh cylinder model to simulate spatiotemporal receptor occupancy and derive an analytical solution, a mechanistically weighted global AFTIR, that can better predict receptor occupancy regardless of dosing regimen. In addition to the four key parameters previously identified, a fifth key parameter, the absolute receptor density (targets/cell), is incorporated into the mechanistic AFTIR metric. Receptor density can influence equilibrium intratumoral drug concentration relative to whether the dose is saturating or not, thereby influencing the tumor penetration depth of the antibody. We derive mechanistic RO predictions based on distinct patterns of antibody tumor penetration, presented as a global AFTIR metric guided by a Thiele Modulus and a local saturation potential (drug equivalent of binding potential for positron emissions tomography imaging) and validate the results using rigorous global and local sensitivity analysis. This generalized AFTIR serves as a more accurate analytical metric to aid clinical dose decisions and rational design of antibody-based therapeutics without the need for extensive PDE simulations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Determining antibody-receptor occupancy (RO) is critical for dosing decisions in pharmaceutical development, but direct clinical measurement of RO is often challenging and invasive, particularly for solid tumors. Significant efforts have been made to develop mathematical models and simplified analytical metrics of RO, but these often require complex computer simulations. Here we present a mathematically rigorous but simplified analytical model to accurately predict RO across a range of affinities, doses, drug, and tumor properties.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalNeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalComputer SimulationDrug DevelopmentHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID37105581
PMCPMC11046736
OpenAlexW4367185851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.