Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37105267›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance use and addiction treatment2023

Women with substance use disorders are highly impacted by the overturning of Roe v. Wade: Advocacy steps are urgently needed.

Melissa N Slavin, Brooke S West, Frances R Levin, Nabila El-Bassel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance use and addiction treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa N SlavinSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: ms6023@columbia.edu.
Brooke S WestSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Frances R LevinColumbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, USA.
Nabila El-BasselSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USNew York State Psychiatric Institute

Funding

Training Program on HIV and Substance Use in the Criminal Justice SystemT32DA037801 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Nabila El-Bassel, Lisa R Metsch · 2014 to 2026
$5.7M
Administrative Supplement for K01 Adaptation of a Digital Group-Based Intervention to Reduce Drug Use and Increase Contraceptive Use among Reproductive-Aged Women Involved in Criminal Justice SystemK01DA055762 · NIDA · FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY · PI Melissa N. Slavin · 2022 to 2026
$980k
NICHD NIH HHS L50 HD106398NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA055762NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA037801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Supreme Court's ruling to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade verdict represents a major setback for women's reproductive freedoms in the United States. This ruling revokes constitutional protection for abortion rights and returns the decision to the states. Since this ruling in June 2022, numerous states have adopted total or near total abortion bans, with many of these bans offering no exception for rape, incest, or nonfatal maternal health risks. Legal experts also warn that this ruling can open the door to restrict contraceptive rights previously protected under the same implied constitutional right to privacy as abortion. Already, this decision has increased momentum for states to place restrictions on specific forms of contraception. Certain groups of women will be disproportionately harmed by these bans, such as women with substance use disorders (SUDs). Women with SUDs face unique barriers to sexual and reproductive health services that exist at the structural level (e.g., criminalization; costs and accessibility), interpersonal level (e.g., higher rates of intimate partner violence) and individual level (e.g., reduced reproductive autonomy). These synergistic barriers interact to produce lower contraceptive use, increased unintended pregnancy rates, and subsequently a greater need for abortion services among this population. This ruling will exacerbate the effects of these barriers on women with SUDs, resulting in even greater difficulties accessing contraceptive and abortion services, and ultimately increasing rates of criminalization among pregnant and parenting women with SUDs. This commentary describes these barriers and highlights potential advocacy steps that are urgently needed to assist reproductive-aged women with SUDs during these challenging times when essential health services are increasingly inaccessible.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedSubstance-Related DisordersAdultContraceptive AgentsFemaleHumansJudicial RolePregnancyPrivacyUnited StatesContraceptive AgentsRoe v. WadeSexual and reproductive healthSubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID37105267
PMCPMC10433178
OpenAlexW4366977399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.