Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37104887›Full record

SynthesisCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2023

Common and distinct correlates of construction and elaboration of episodic-autobiographical memory: An ALE meta-analysis.

Sarah Daviddi, Tiziana Pedale, Peggy L St Jacques, Daniel L Schacter, Valerio Santangelo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Semantic encoding of trauma memories in the hippocampus among individuals with PTSD.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah DaviddiDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences & Education, University of Perugia, Italy. Electronic address: sarah.daviddi@collaboratori.unipg.it.
Tiziana PedaleDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Functional Neuroimaging Laboratory, Fondazione Santa Lucia, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Peggy L St JacquesDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Daniel L SchacterDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Valerio SantangeloDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences & Education, University of Perugia, Italy; Functional Neuroimaging Laboratory, Fondazione Santa Lucia, IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: valerio.santangelo@unipg.it.

Funding

EVENT RELATED NEUROIMAGING OF HUMAN MEMORY FORMATIONR01MH060941 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHACTER, DANIEL L · 2000 to 2025
$9.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recollection of episodic-autobiographical memories (EAMs) entails a complex temporal dynamic, from initial "construction" to subsequent "elaboration" of memories. While there is consensus that EAM retrieval involves a distributed network of brain regions, it is still largely debated which regions specifically contribute to EAM construction and/or elaboration. To clarify this issue, we conducted an Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analysis based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic-Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. We found common recruitment of the left hippocampus and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) during both phases. Additionally, EAM construction led to activations in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, left angular gyrus (AG), right hippocampus, and precuneus, while the right inferior frontal gyrus was activated by EAM elaboration. Although most of these regions are distributed over the default mode network, the current findings highlight a differential contribution according to early (midline regions, left/right hippocampus, and left AG) versus later (left hippocampus, and PCC) recollection. Overall, these findings contribute to clarify the neural correlates that support the temporal dynamics of EAM recollection.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMental RecallALE meta-AnalysisConstructionDefault mode networkElaborationEpisodic-autobiographical memory

Identifiers

PMID37104887
PMCPMC10192150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.