Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37104875›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2023

Understanding Lifelong Factors and Prediction Models of Social Functioning After Psychosis Onset Using the Large-Scale GROUP Cohort Study.

Natalia Tiles-Sar, Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold, Edith J Liemburg, Lisette van der Meer, Richard Bruggeman, Behrooz Z Alizadeh, GROUP investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natalia Tiles-SarDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6128-114X
Tesfa Dejenie HabtewoldDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Edith J LiemburgDepartment of Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lisette van der MeerDepartment of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Universityof Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Richard BruggemanDepartment of Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Behrooz Z AlizadehDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
GROUP investigators

Funding

GGZ DrentheGGZ FrieslandGGZ inGeestHealth Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisCurrent rates of poor social functioning (SF) in people with psychosis history reach 80% worldwide. We aimed to identify a core set of lifelong predictors and build prediction models of SF after psychosis onset. STUDY

designWe utilized data of 1119 patients from the Genetic Risk and Outcome in Psychosis (GROUP) longitudinal Dutch cohort. First, we applied group-based trajectory modeling to identify premorbid adjustment trajectories. We further investigated the association between the premorbid adjustment trajectories, six-year-long cognitive deficits, positive, and negative symptoms trajectories, and SF at 3-year and 6-year follow-ups. Next, we checked associations between demographics, clinical, and environmental factors measured at the baseline and SF at follow-up. Finally, we built and internally validated 2 predictive models of SF. STUDY

resultsWe found all trajectories were significantly associated with SF (P < .01), explaining up to 16% of SF variation (R2 0.15 for 3- and 0.16 for 6-year follow-up). Demographics (sex, ethnicity, age, education), clinical parameters (genetic predisposition, illness duration, psychotic episodes, cannabis use), and environment (childhood trauma, number of moves, marriage, employment, urbanicity, unmet needs of social support) were also significantly associated with SF. After validation, final prediction models explained a variance up to 27% (95% CI: 0.23, 0.30) at 3-year and 26% (95% CI: 0.22, 0.31) at 6-year follow-up.

conclusionsWe found a core set of lifelong predictors of SF. Yet, the performance of our prediction models was moderate.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSocial InteractionCohort StudiesHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareSocial Adjustmentassociationfollow-upmixed-effect model/trajectoriesschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID37104875
PMCPMC10686366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.