Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37104871›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2023

A 6-Week Program to Strengthen Resiliency Among Women With Metastatic Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Arash Asher, Celina H Shirazipour, Jessica M Capaldi, Sungjin Kim, Marcio Diniz, Bronwen Jones, Jeffrey Wertheimer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02707510 (A Randomized Controlled Trial to Strengthen Existential Resiliency Among Women With Metastatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02707510 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Strengthen Existential Resiliency Among Women With Metastatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorCedars-Sinai Medical CenterRan2016 to 2020Enrolled71ConditionsBreast Neoplasms, Neoplasm MetastasisArmsGrowing Resiliency And CouragE with Cancer™ (GRACE)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Hope and spiritual well-being: two sides of the same coin?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arash AsherDepartment of Medicine and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Patient and Family Support Program at Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7080-611X
Celina H ShirazipourDivision of Population Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jessica M CapaldiDivision of Population Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sungjin KimBiostatistics Research Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Marcio DinizBiostatistics Research Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2427-7843
Bronwen JonesDepartment of Spiritual Care, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey WertheimerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an intervention (Growing Resilience And CouragE; GRACE) on spiritual well-being, quality of life, and general well-being in women with metastatic cancers reporting existential or spiritual distress. PATIENTS AND

methodsProspective, randomized, wait-list control clinical trial. Women with metastatic cancer experiencing existential or spiritual concerns were randomized to GRACE or waitlist control. Survey data were collected at baseline, end of program, and 1-month follow-up. Participants included English-speaking women, 18 or older, with metastatic cancer, existential or spiritual concerns, and reasonable medical stability. Eighty-one women were assessed for eligibility; 10 were excluded (not meeting exclusion criteria, refusal to participate, and death). The primary outcome was spiritual well-being measured pre- and post-program. Secondary measures assessed quality of life, anxiety, depression, hopelessness, and loneliness.

resultsSeventy-one women (aged 47-72) were enrolled (GRACE n = 37, waitlist control n = 34). GRACE participants demonstrated significant improvements in spiritual well-being compared to control at end of program (parameter estimate (PE), 16.67, 95% CI, 13.17, 20.16) and 1-month follow-up (PE, 10.31, 95% CI, 6.73, 13.89). Additionally, significant improvements were demonstrated in quality of life at the end of program (PE, 8.51, 95% CI, 4.26, 12.76) and 1-month follow-up (PE, 6.17, 95% CI, 1.75, 10.58). GRACE participants also demonstrated improved depression and hopelessness at follow-up, as well as improved anxiety.

conclusionsFindings suggest the value of evidence-based psychoeducational and experiential interventions for improving the well-being and quality of life of women with advanced cancer.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02707510.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSpiritualitybreast cancerhealth promotionqualify of lifespirituality

Identifiers

PMID37104871
PMCPMC10400157
OpenAlexW4367172933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.