ArticleRetinal cases & brief reports2023
Scleral Thickness in Autosomal Dominant Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy.
Article in Retinal cases & brief reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the posterior and equatorial scleral thickness in patients with autosomal dominant Best disease, a condition that has chronic subretinal fluid.
methodsRetrospective study involving patients with Best disease and age-matched controls. Participants were evaluated with contact B-scan ultrasonography and enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography to evaluate scleral thickness in the posterior pole and equator. Univariate analysis and generalized estimating equations were used.
resultsOf 9 patients with genetically proven Best disease and 23 age-matched controls, there was no significant difference in the age or the gender proportion between groups. Subfoveal choroidal thickness and axial length were not significantly different between groups. Both posterior scleral (OD; 1.38mm vs. 0.89mm, P<.001 and OS; 1.39mm vs. 0.83mm, P<.001) and equatorial scleral (OD; 0.61mm vs. 0.42mm, P=.003, and OS; 0.55mm vs. 0.41mm, P=.017) thicknesses were much greater in cases as compared with controls. Multivariate analysis showed male sex and having Best disease were each significant predictors of posterior scleral thickness and Best disease was the sole significant predictor for equatorial scleral thickness.
conclusionBEST1 gene may have a developmental role leading to having a thicker sclera, influencing disease manifestation, and contributing to the accumulation of subretinal fluid in Best disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.