Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37104795›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2023

Transition dynamics shape mental state concepts.

Mark A Thornton, Milena Rmus, Amisha D Vyas, Diana I Tamir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Conceptual priorities shape individual gaze patterns during naturalistic visual attention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Transition dynamics shape mental state concepts.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark A ThorntonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College.ORCID 0000-0001-5985-3030
Milena RmusDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.
Amisha D VyasDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College.
Diana I TamirDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University.

Funding

The structure and dynamics of mental state representationsR01MH114904 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TAMIR, DIANA · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People have a unique ability to represent other people's internal thoughts and feelings-their mental states. Mental state knowledge has a rich conceptual structure, organized along key dimensions, such as valence. People use this conceptual structure to guide social interactions. How do people acquire their understanding of this structure? Here we investigate an underexplored contributor to this process: observation of mental state dynamics. Mental states-including both emotions and cognitive states-are not static. Rather, the transitions from one state to another are systematic and predictable. Drawing on prior cognitive science, we hypothesize that these transition dynamics may shape the conceptual structure that people learn to apply to mental states. Across nine behavioral experiments (

Indexed as

EmotionsJudgmentHumansLearningProbability

Identifiers

PMID37104795
PMCPMC10593093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.