Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37104486›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Structured lactation support and human donor milk for German NICUs-Protocol on an intervention design based on a multidimensional status quo and needs assessment (Neo-MILK).

Nadine Scholten, Alicia Fitzgerald, Katja Matthias, Mi-Ran Okumu, Tim Ohnhäuser, Katharina Schmitz, Christine Schreiner, Isabella Schwab, Anna Stirner, Ricarda Wullenkord and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nadine ScholtenFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Chair for Health Services Research, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7793-7745
Alicia FitzgeraldFaculty of Law, Henrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Katja MatthiasTAKEPART Media + Science GmbH, Cologne, Germany.
Mi-Ran OkumuFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Chair for Health Services Research, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Tim OhnhäuserFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Chair for Health Services Research, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Katharina SchmitzDivision of Neonatology, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Christine SchreinerDept. of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Isabella SchwabFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science, Chair for Health Services Research, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anna StirnerFaculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ricarda WullenkordCITEC, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Till DresbachDept. of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Neo-MILK
University of Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEAcademy of Media Arts Cologne · DEBielefeld University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMother's own milk is the best nutrition for every newborn and especially for vulnerable infants such as preterm infants with a very low birth weight below 1,500 grams (VLBW). If no MOM is available, human donor milk is the alternative of choice. Mothers of preterm born infants face challenging conditions that impair sufficient milk production. For this reason, it is particularly important to provide structural lactation support and, at the same time, to promote the establishment of human donor milk banks. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Via a multidisciplinary approach the Neo-MILK study will develop an intervention for structured breastfeeding and lactation support. This will be based on a comprehensive status quo and needs assessment. In addition, the implementation of human donor milk banks (HDMB) will be supported by the development of standards. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Intervention development is participatory, involving different disciplines and stakeholders. All surveys are subject to approval by the ethics committee. During the course of the project, the results will be communicated to the scientific community and the general public via publications, the project homepage and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00024799 (German Clinical Trials Register).

Indexed as

Breast FeedingInfant, PrematureClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, Very Low Birth WeightIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLactationMilk, HumanMothersNeeds Assessment

Identifiers

PMID37104486
PMCPMC10138472
OpenAlexW4367173806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.