Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37104254›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Antimicrobial consumption in food-producing animals in Thailand between 2017 and 2019: The analysis of national importation and production data.

Angkana Lekagul, Supapat Kirivan, Natthasit Tansakul, Charunee Krisanaphan, Julaporn Srinha, Thitiporn Laoprasert, Wanwisa Kaewkhankhaeng, Viroj Tangcharoensathien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial ResistantInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Angkana LekagulInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6123-8376
Supapat KirivanInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Natthasit TansakulDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2991-2682
Charunee KrisanaphanFood and Drug Administration, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Julaporn SrinhaDepartment of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperative, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thitiporn LaoprasertDepartment of Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperative, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wanwisa KaewkhankhaengInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Viroj TangcharoensathienInternational Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens health security and the economy worldwide. AMR bacteria can spread across humans, animals, food webs and the environment. Excessive use of antimicrobials in food-producing animals has been recognised as one of the main drivers of the emergence of resistant bacteria. This study aims to quantify and identify patterns of antimicrobial consumption in food-producing animals in Thailand in a three-year period (2017-2019). Milligrams of active ingredient from total volume of imported and locally manufactured products minus exports were obtained from Thai FDA. Annual population production of food-producing animals in 2017, 2018 and 2019 was compiled and validated through cooperation between the Department of Livestock Development (DLD), Department of Fisheries (DOF). The total amount of antimicrobial consumption for food-producing animals decreased 49.0% over the three-year period from 658.7 mg/PCUThailand in 2017 to 336.3 mg/PCUThailand in 2019. In 2017, the most common antimicrobials used was macrolides which was replaced by aminopenicillins and pleuromutilins in 2019, while tetracyclines was consistently common over the three-year period. Consumption of the WHO Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIA) group declined significantly over this period, from 259.0 in 2017 to 193.2 mg/PCUThailand in 2019 (a 25.4% reduction). Findings from this study were in line with national policies which curtails prudent use of antimicrobials in food-producing animals. The government should maintain the decreasing trend of consumption, in particular of the CIA category. Improving information systems which captures consumption by specific species contributes to precision of interventions to minimise prudent use in each species.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaHumansLivestockThailandAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID37104254
PMCPMC10138855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.