Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37104141›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023

Using Brain Tumor MRI Structured Reporting to Quantify the Impact of Imaging on Brain Tumor Boards.

Syed A Abidi, Michael J Hoch, Ranliang Hu, Gelareh Sadigh, Alfredo Voloschin, Jeffrey J Olson, Hui-Kuo G Shu, Stewart G Neill, Brent D Weinberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Syed A AbidiMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Michael J HochDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Ranliang HuDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Gelareh SadighDepartment of Radiology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA 92868, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3233-1878
Alfredo VoloschinDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL 32806, USA.
Jeffrey J OlsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Hui-Kuo G ShuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Stewart G NeillDepartment of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Brent D WeinbergDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7992-1747
Emory University · USMallinckrodt (United States) · USOrlando Health · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multidisciplinary tumor boards (TB) are an essential part of brain tumor care, but quantifying the impact of imaging on patient management is challenging due to treatment complexity and a lack of quantitative outcome measures. This work uses a structured reporting system for classifying brain tumor MRIs, the brain tumor reporting and data system (BT-RADS), in a TB setting to prospectively assess the impact of imaging review on patient management. Published criteria were used to prospectively assign three separate BT-RADS scores (an initial radiology report, secondary TB presenter review, and TB consensus) to brain MRIs reviewed at an adult brain TB. Clinical recommendations at TB were noted and management changes within 90 days after TB were determined by chart review. In total, 212 MRIs in 130 patients (median age = 57 years) were reviewed. Agreement was 82.2% between report and presenter, 79.0% between report and consensus, and 90.1% between presenter and consensus. Rates of management change increased with increasing BT-RADS scores (0-3.1%, 1a-0%, 1b-66.7%, 2-8.3%, 3a-38.5%, 3b-55.9, 3c-92.0%, and 4-95.6%). Of 184 (86.8%) cases with clinical follow-up within 90 days after the tumor board, 155 (84.2%) of the recommendations were implemented. Structured scoring of MRIs provides a quantitative way to assess rates of agreement interpretation alongside how often management changes are recommended and implemented in a TB setting.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainHumansMiddle Agedbrain tumorglioblastomamultidisciplinarystructured reportingtumor board

Identifiers

PMID37104141
PMCPMC10146901
OpenAlexW4366274317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.